[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4deb96d9-509c-3b3f-934f-58de8d29241b@loongson.cn>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 20:24:25 +0800
From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc: loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vishal.moola@...il.com, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] LoongArch: Refine init_hw_perf_events()
在 2025/11/10 下午2:48, Huacai Chen 写道:
> V1 was applied last week and now in linux-next, don't do meaningless work.
>
> Huacai
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 10:59 AM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>>
>> This version is based on 6.18-rc5, use the proper patch title
>> to make it clear.
>>
>> Tiezhu Yang (2):
>> LoongArch: Use CPUCFG6_PMNUM_SHIFT to get PMU number
>> LoongArch: Detect PMU bits via CPUCFG instruction
>>
>> arch/loongarch/include/asm/loongarch.h | 1 +
>> arch/loongarch/kernel/perf_event.c | 7 ++++---
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
I do not like to argue with you, but I do not think what you said is
right, there are double standards here.
The code are rebased frequently by you in linux-loongson.git, the latest
is after 6.18-rc5 that is in this week, my patch is also rebased.
You accepted the suggestion of your patch v1 title [1] and send v2 [2]
although v1 has been applied by Andrew, because you think it is a good
suggestion.
I just do the similar and right thing, but your reply is not polite
and friendly, and also do not do the thing what you should to do as a
maintainer.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20251108084724.3e389b6597294900347b0476@linux-foundation.org/
[2]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20251109021817.346181-1-chenhuacai@loongson.cn/
[3]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chenhuacai/linux-loongson.git/commit/?h=loongarch-fixes&id=4c8a7c982772
Thanks,
Tiezhu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists