lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <39ae7079-3dcc-43a5-812b-a6c2b015270d@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 13:38:06 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>, niravkumarlaxmidas.rabara@...era.com,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: intel: Add Agilex3 SoCFPGA board

On 10/11/2025 13:36, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/10/25 01:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 10/11/2025 07:47, niravkumarlaxmidas.rabara@...era.com wrote:
>>> From: Niravkumar L Rabara <niravkumarlaxmidas.rabara@...era.com>
>>>
>>> Add compatible for Agilex3 SoCFPGA board.
> 
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Niravkumar L Rabara <niravkumarlaxmidas.rabara@...era.com>
>>> ---
>>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/intel,socfpga.yaml | 5 +++++
>>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/intel,socfpga.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/intel,socfpga.yaml
>>> index cf7a91dfec8a..e706c4eff019 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/intel,socfpga.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/intel,socfpga.yaml
>>> @@ -21,6 +21,11 @@ properties:
>>>                 - intel,socfpga-agilex-n6000
>>>                 - intel,socfpga-agilex-socdk
>>>             - const: intel,socfpga-agilex
>>> +      - description: Agilex3 boards
>>
>> Agilex3?
>>
> 
>  From what I understand, the Agilex3 is the same chip as the Agilex5, 
> minus 2 CPU cores. So I recommended to Nirav, just to add the binding in 
> the Agilex5 context.

If that is not the same die, then probably should have still agilex3
compatible (you still can have fallback).

> 
>>> +        items:
>>> +          - enum:
>>> +              - intel,socfpga-agilex3-socdk
>>> +          - const: intel,socfpga-agilex5
>>
>> Or Agilex5? Decide. Cannot be both.
>>
>  From the explanation above, could we document the agilex3 socdk this way?
> 
> Thanks,
> Dinh


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ