[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aRNOfir6X9FmaUrd@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 14:55:58 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Ankit Khushwaha <ankitkhushwaha.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftest: net: fix variable sized type not at the end of
struct warnings
On Sat, Nov 08, 2025 at 10:59:59PM +0530, Ankit Khushwaha wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 05:23:12PM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 10:38:56AM +0530, Ankit Khushwaha wrote:
> > > Some network selftests defined variable-sized types defined at the end of
> > > struct causing -Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end warning.
> > >
> > > warning:
> > > timestamping.c:285:18: warning: field 'cm' with variable sized type
> > > 'struct cmsghdr' not at the end of a struct or class is a GNU
> > > extension [-Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end]
> > > 285 | struct cmsghdr cm;
> > > | ^
> > >
> > > ipsec.c:835:5: warning: field 'u' with variable sized type 'union
> > > (unnamed union at ipsec.c:831:3)' not at the end of a struct or class
> > > is a GNU extension [-Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end]
> > > 835 | } u;
> > > | ^
> > >
> > > This patch move these field at the end of struct to fix these warnings.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ankit Khushwaha <ankitkhushwaha.linux@...il.com>
> >
> > Hi Ankit,
> >
> > I don't believe this change is correct.
> >
> > I think that the intention of the code is the char arrays (buf and control)
> > provide the buffer space for the variable-length trailing field
> > of the preceding structure. Where we basically have a header followed
> > by data. But your patch would place the before the header.
> >
> Hi Simon,
> So if buf and control providing the buffer space, then i think it is
> better to suppress `-Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end` warning
> within this block of code.
>
> #pragma GCC diagnostic push
> #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end"
I'm unsure of the attitude towards using #pragma like this in kernel code,
but certainly it would be a new one for me.
>
> struct {
> union {
> struct xfrm_algo alg;
> struct xfrm_algo_aead aead;
> struct xfrm_algo_auth auth;
> } u;
> char buf[XFRM_ALGO_KEY_BUF_SIZE];
> } alg = {};
>
> #pragma GCC diagnostic pop
>
> I think this would be fine.
In my view, the most promising approach I am aware of is using
TRAILING_OVERLAP(), as illustrated in [1]. However, that
approach was recently rejected, so I guess that means
it doesn't have much promise after all.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/aPdx4iPK4-KIhjFq@kspp/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists