linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] rust: clist: Add abstraction for iterating over C linked lists

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72nU7LOSEv=RsewAwiEbeO4=pTqg_pm+WJGfum90BC43kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 21:32:05 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Guillaume Gomez <guillaume1.gomez@...il.com>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>, Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, 
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, dakr@...nel.org, 
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, 
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, 
	Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, 
	Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, 
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, 
	Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, 
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Timur Tabi <ttabi@...dia.com>, joel@...lfernandes.org, 
	Elle Rhumsaa <elle@...thered-steel.dev>, Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>, 
	Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>, Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	Nouveau <nouveau-bounces@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] rust: clist: Add abstraction for iterating over C
 linked lists

On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 11:54 AM Guillaume Gomez
<guillaume1.gomez@...il.com> wrote:
>
> You can add your own tags in the doctests, and with our patch waiting
> to use the new rustdoc doctests extraction, it should be pretty easy
> to plug such a feature into it. We can check it together if you want
> when the patch is merged to see if we already have everything needed
> or if I need to add more things on rustdoc side.

If you mean the `unknown` field (in the JSON) that I mentioned in my
message, then yeah, I think that is good enough (though we should
probably still prevent collisions with future `rustdoc` ones).

If you mean something else that I may be missing, please let me know, of course!

And yeah, we can take a look together (likely after LPC).

Thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel