[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2acd7c1d-e2b4-40a0-85de-55f9b2635dad@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 20:07:24 +0530
From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Mason <clm@...a.com>,
Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...cle.com>,
Adam Li <adamli@...amperecomputing.com>,
Hazem Mohamed Abuelfotoh <abuehaze@...zon.com>,
Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched/fair: Small cleanup to sched_balance_newidle()
On 11/7/25 9:36 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Pull out the !sd check to simplify code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -12811,14 +12811,16 @@ static int sched_balance_newidle(struct
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> sd = rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain(this_rq->sd);
> + if (!sd) {
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + goto out;
> + }
>
when is sd null? on isol_cpus ?
if sd is null, i think we are skipping these compared to earlier.
t0 = sched_clock_cpu(this_cpu);
sched_balance_update_blocked_averages(this_cpu);
> if (!get_rd_overloaded(this_rq->rd) ||
> - (sd && this_rq->avg_idle < sd->max_newidle_lb_cost)) {
> + this_rq->avg_idle < sd->max_newidle_lb_cost) {
>
> - if (sd)
> - update_next_balance(sd, &next_balance);
> + update_next_balance(sd, &next_balance);
> rcu_read_unlock();
> -
> goto out;
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists