[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251112143858.GA3006@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 15:38:58 +0100
From: hch <hch@....de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc: hch <hch@....de>, Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Carlos Maiolino <cem@...nel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-raid@...r.kernel.org" <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: fall back from direct to buffered I/O when stable writes are
required
On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 10:18:40PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Looks buffer overwrite is actually done by buggy software in guest side,
> why is qemu's trouble? Or will qemu IO emulator write to the IO buffer
> when guest IO is inflight?
It is ultimately caused by the guest. But just like local software it
is in no way buggy just because you don't like the pattern.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists