[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3026616.e9J7NaK4W3@rafael.j.wysocki>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 17:24:40 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@....com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Reka Norman <rekanorman@...omium.org>
Subject:
[PATCH v1 3/4] cpuidle: governors: teo: Use s64 consistently in teo_update()
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Two local variables in teo_update() are defined as u64, but their
values are then compared with s64 values, so it is more consistent
to use s64 as their data type.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c
@@ -157,8 +157,7 @@ static void teo_update(struct cpuidle_dr
{
struct teo_cpu *cpu_data = per_cpu_ptr(&teo_cpus, dev->cpu);
int i, idx_timer = 0, idx_duration = 0;
- s64 target_residency_ns;
- u64 measured_ns;
+ s64 target_residency_ns, measured_ns;
cpu_data->short_idles -= cpu_data->short_idles >> DECAY_SHIFT;
@@ -167,9 +166,9 @@ static void teo_update(struct cpuidle_dr
* If one of the safety nets has triggered, assume that this
* might have been a long sleep.
*/
- measured_ns = U64_MAX;
+ measured_ns = S64_MAX;
} else {
- u64 lat_ns = drv->states[dev->last_state_idx].exit_latency_ns;
+ s64 lat_ns = drv->states[dev->last_state_idx].exit_latency_ns;
measured_ns = dev->last_residency_ns;
/*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists