[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6484e7a7-6094-49a3-8b86-ede29c630596@nxp.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 19:37:48 +0200
From: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>
To: Laurentiu Mihalcea <laurentiumihalcea111@...il.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: imx9: use SCMI API for LM management
On 11/12/2025 4:41 PM, Laurentiu Mihalcea wrote:
> From: Laurentiu Mihalcea <laurentiu.mihalcea@....com>
>
> Linux supports NXP's LMM SCMI protocol so switch to using the appropriate
> API. The SIPs were intended to act as placeholders until the support for
> said protocol was upstreamed.
>
> The underlying CPU protocol command from IMX_SIP_SRC_M_RESET_ADDR_SET is
> replaced by a LMM protocol command with the same effect (i.e. setting the
> boot address) since using the CPU protocol would require additional
> permissions (which TF-A already had). Apart from this, the SIPs are
> replaced by their equivalent Linux LMM commands.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Mihalcea <laurentiu.mihalcea@....com>
> ---
> sound/soc/sof/imx/imx9.c | 36 ++++++++----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/imx/imx9.c b/sound/soc/sof/imx/imx9.c
> index 853155d5990a..e56e8a1c8022 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/sof/imx/imx9.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/sof/imx/imx9.c
> @@ -3,19 +3,11 @@
> * Copyright 2025 NXP
> */
>
> -#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> +#include <linux/firmware/imx/sm.h>
>
> #include "imx-common.h"
>
> -#define IMX_SIP_SRC 0xC2000005
> -#define IMX_SIP_SRC_M_RESET_ADDR_SET 0x03
> -
> -#define IMX95_CPU_VEC_FLAGS_BOOT BIT(29)
> -
> -#define IMX_SIP_LMM 0xC200000F
> -#define IMX_SIP_LMM_BOOT 0x0
> -#define IMX_SIP_LMM_SHUTDOWN 0x1
> -
> +#define IMX95_M7_CPU_ID 0x1
> #define IMX95_M7_LM_ID 0x1
>
> static struct snd_soc_dai_driver imx95_dai[] = {
> @@ -38,7 +30,6 @@ static int imx95_ops_init(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev)
>
> static int imx95_chip_probe(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev)
> {
> - struct arm_smccc_res smc_res;
> struct platform_device *pdev;
> struct resource *res;
>
> @@ -49,31 +40,20 @@ static int imx95_chip_probe(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev)
> return dev_err_probe(sdev->dev, -ENODEV,
> "failed to fetch SRAM region\n");
>
> - /* set core boot reset address */
> - arm_smccc_smc(IMX_SIP_SRC, IMX_SIP_SRC_M_RESET_ADDR_SET, res->start,
> - IMX95_CPU_VEC_FLAGS_BOOT, 0, 0, 0, 0, &smc_res);
> -
> - return smc_res.a0;
> + return scmi_imx_lmm_reset_vector_set(IMX95_M7_LM_ID, IMX95_M7_CPU_ID,
> + 0, res->start);
Please add a dependency for SND_SOC_SOF_IMX9 on CONFIG_IMX_SCMI_LMM_DRV.
Without this, the functions scmi_imx_lmm_reset_vector_set and
scmi_imx_lmm_operation will return -EOPNOTSUPP.
Iulia
> }
>
> static int imx95_core_kick(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev)
> {
> - struct arm_smccc_res smc_res;
> -
> - arm_smccc_smc(IMX_SIP_LMM, IMX_SIP_LMM_BOOT,
> - IMX95_M7_LM_ID, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &smc_res);
> -
> - return smc_res.a0;
> + return scmi_imx_lmm_operation(IMX95_M7_LM_ID, SCMI_IMX_LMM_BOOT, 0);
> }
>
> static int imx95_core_shutdown(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev)
> {
> - struct arm_smccc_res smc_res;
> -
> - arm_smccc_smc(IMX_SIP_LMM, IMX_SIP_LMM_SHUTDOWN,
> - IMX95_M7_LM_ID, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &smc_res);
> -
> - return smc_res.a0;
> + return scmi_imx_lmm_operation(IMX95_M7_LM_ID,
> + SCMI_IMX_LMM_SHUTDOWN,
> + SCMI_IMX_LMM_OP_FORCEFUL);
> }
>
> static const struct imx_chip_ops imx95_chip_ops = {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists