[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aRTKf6iw0sRuC0ww@google.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 09:57:19 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf stat: Align metric output without events
On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 11:28:34PM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> One of my concern in the perf stat output was the alignment in the
> metrics and shadow stats. I think it missed to calculate the basic
> output length using COUNTS_LEN and EVNAME_LEN but missed to add the
> unit length like "msec" and surround 2 spaces. I'm not sure why it's
> not printed below though.
>
> But anyway, now it shows correctly aligned metric output.
>
> $ perf stat true
>
> Performance counter stats for 'true':
>
> 859,772 task-clock # 0.395 CPUs utilized
> 0 context-switches # 0.000 /sec
> 0 cpu-migrations # 0.000 /sec
> 56 page-faults # 65.134 K/sec
> 1,075,022 instructions # 0.86 insn per cycle
> 1,255,911 cycles # 1.461 GHz
> 220,573 branches # 256.548 M/sec
> 7,381 branch-misses # 3.35% of all branches
> TopdownL1 # 19.2 % tma_retiring
> # 28.6 % tma_backend_bound
> # 9.5 % tma_bad_speculation
> # 42.6 % tma_frontend_bound
>
> 0.002174871 seconds time elapsed ^
> |
> 0.002154000 seconds user |
> 0.000000000 seconds sys here
>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Best regards,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists