[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADhLXY4qMvBTqirNmzgiPszn8vCkCFV6GGeDkNpxVDi32uhzEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 12:58:57 +0530
From: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@...il.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@...el.com>,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+f64019ba229e3a5c411b@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memfd: clear hugetlb pages on allocation
Hi Hugh,
Thank you for the quick review and for looping in the hugetlb maintainers!
You raise good points about the approach. I chose explicit zeroing in
memfd_alloc_folio() because hugetlb_reserve_pages() can allocate pages
without seeing the __GFP_ZERO flag, but I'm happy to revise if the
hugetlb maintainers prefer a different approach.
I'll add the Fixes: 89c1905d9c14 tag and Cc: stable in v2.
Should I send v2 now with just the tag added, or wait for feedback from
Muchun/Oscar/David on the overall approach first?
Thanks,
Deepanshu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists