[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dd488c39-3aa3-43f6-8cf7-abca4af3cc7a@bootlin.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 09:16:20 +0100
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>,
Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Nicolò Veronese <nicveronese@...il.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, mwojtas@...omium.org,
Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
Dimitri Fedrau <dimitri.fedrau@...bherr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v15 01/15] dt-bindings: net: Introduce the
ethernet-connector description
On 11/11/2025 04:34, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 10:47:26AM +0100, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
>> The ability to describe the physical ports of Ethernet devices is useful
>> to describe multi-port devices, as well as to remove any ambiguity with
>> regard to the nature of the port.
>>
>> Moreover, describing ports allows for a better description of features
>> that are tied to connectors, such as PoE through the PSE-PD devices.
>>
>> Introduce a binding to allow describing the ports, for now with 2
>> attributes :
>>
>> - The number of lanes, which is a quite generic property that allows
>> differentating between multiple similar technologies such as BaseT1
>> and "regular" BaseT (which usually means BaseT4).
>
> You still use lanes here, but the implementation has moved on to
> pairs.
>
> Please add my Reviewed-by when you fix this.
Arg, I've made updates on lanes -> pairs, but as you point out I have
missed a few :( thanks for spotting this,
Maxime
>
> Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists