linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] soundwire: send multi sections in one BPT stream

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aRRJXZz5KX4eufmC@vaman>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 14:16:21 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: "Liao, Bard" <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.dev, bard.liao@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] soundwire: send multi sections in one BPT stream

On 12-11-25, 14:13, Liao, Bard wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/12/2025 1:12 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 21-10-25, 17:43, Bard Liao wrote:
> >> Currently we send a BRA message with a start address with continuous
> >> registers in a BPT stream. However, a codec may need to write different
> >> register sections shortly. It makes more sense to send different
> >> register sections in a BPT stream and no need to close/open the BPT
> >> stream repeatedly.
> >>
> >> This series depends on the "ASoC/soundwire: add fake BPT frame to align
> >> Intel DMA buffer size" series. Sending it now to get more review time.
> > 
> > I have applied it on top of above series, pls check why it is not
> > applying in :
> > error: patch failed: drivers/soundwire/intel_ace2x.c:156
> > error: drivers/soundwire/intel_ace2x.c: patch does not apply
> > 
> 
> Hi Vinod,
> 
> I just tried "git am" this series again and it can apply on top of
> 04878e873d94 ("ASoC/soundwire: add fake BPT frame to align Intel DMA
> buffer size").
> Also, I checked drivers/soundwire/intel_ace2x.c line 156 and it has the
> same content as the "soundwire: introduce BPT section" patch.
> Sorry, I have no idea why it didn't apply. Could you please try again?

Yeah I fixed the commit base and it worked, thanks

-- 
~Vinod