linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] Hello,

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87seej7fv6.fsf@bootlin.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 10:35:41 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>,  Michael Walle
 <mwalle@...nel.org>,  Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,  Vignesh
 Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,  Thomas Petazzoni
 <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,  Steam Lin <STLin2@...bond.com>,
  linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
  stable@...r.kernel.org,  Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Hello,

On 10/11/2025 at 08:54:24 +02, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org> wrote:

> Hi, Miquel,
>
> On 11/5/25 7:26 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>> Here is a series adding support for 6 Winbond SPI NOR chips. Describing
>> these chips is needed otherwise the block protection feature is not
>> available. Everything else looks fine otherwise.
>
> I'm glad to see this, you're an locking expert now :). Do you care to
> extend the SPI NOR testing requirements [1] with steps on how to test the
> locking? There's some testing proposed at [2], would you please check and
> review it?

Good idea. Let me have a loot at what Sean proposed.

> [1] https://docs.kernel.org/driver-api/mtd/spi-nor.html#minimum-testing-requirements
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/92e99a96-5582-48a5-a4f9-e9b33fcff171@linux.dev/

Thanks,
Miquèl