linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 11/21] drm/msm/a6xx: Improve MX rail fallback in RPMH vote init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dd32a5e0-1dd1-484d-8fb7-8f6c506c8c83@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 11:59:56 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@....qualcomm.com>,
        Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>,
        Abhinav Kumar
 <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
        Jessica Zhang <jesszhan0024@...il.com>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
        Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
        Jordan Crouse
 <jordan@...micpenguin.net>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        Connor Abbott <cwabbott0@...il.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/21] drm/msm/a6xx: Improve MX rail fallback in RPMH
 vote init

On 11/10/25 5:37 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> Current logic assumes that the voltage corners in both MxG and MxA are
> always same. This is not true for recent targets. So, rework the rpmh init
> sequence to probe and calculate the votes with the respective rails, ie,
> GX rails should use MxG as secondary rail and Cx rail should use MxA as
> the secondary rail.

Is GMU always on Mx*A* and never Mx*C*?

Konrad