[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251112121550.GYaRR6dh590G2TP578@fat_crate.local>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 13:15:50 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] x86/bugs: Decouple ALTERNATIVE usage from VERW
macro definition
On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 09:00:48AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Or better yet, can we name the actual instruction define to VERW_SEQ,
>
> Works for me.
Just call it VERW. If a separate x86-insn-like macro wants to appear, we can
disambiguate then.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists