[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878qgac80n.ffs@tglx>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 15:38:32 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@...cle.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, LKML
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul
E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Madadi Vineeth Reddy
<vineethr@...ux.ibm.com>, K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>, Steven
Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V3 00/12] rseq: Implement time slice extension mechanism
On Thu, Nov 13 2025 at 02:34, Prakash Sangappa wrote:
>> On Nov 12, 2025, at 3:17 PM, Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@...cle.com> wrote:
>>> On Nov 12, 2025, at 1:57 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>>> Can you verify that the top most commit of the rseq/slice branch is:
>>>
>>> d2eb5c9c0693 ("selftests/rseq: Implement time slice extension test")
>>
>> No it is
>>
>> c46f12a1166058764da8e84a215a6b66cae2fe0a
>> selftests/rseq: Implement time slice extension test
>>
>
> Tested the latest from rseq/slice with the top most commit you mentioned above and the
> watchdog panic does not reproduce anymore.
Thanks for checking. I'll post a V4 soonish.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists