[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aRX59JpZJa18QfoQ@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 10:32:04 -0500
From: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
Cc: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fabio.m.de.francesco@...ux.intel.com>,
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>,
Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] CXL updates for v6.19
On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 08:20:59AM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> On 11/13/25 4:01 AM, Robert Richter wrote:
> > On 12.11.25 14:45:28, Dave Jiang wrote:
> >>
> >>
> > Additionally, patch 3/3 (@inc variable change) of this series also
> > depends on patch 02/11 of v5 (store root decoder in in struct
> > cxl_region). If you chose to pickup some patches from v5 first on top
> > of cxl/next, then all this 3 patches should apply cleanly.
> >
> > Since 02/11 is one of the first patches and it sounded to me some of
> > them will be applied as well, I would prefer that order to avoid
> > rebasing and resubmitting a v6 for that. Let me know if you want to
> > handle this differently.
>
> Hmmm....maybe I should just take the entire series hopefully next cycle when it's ready given all the dependencies?
As an active user of the Zen5 translation patch (I've been carrying
backports Zen5 support for over a year), I would greatly prefer not
to delay the Zen5 series for the sake of this series.
~Gregory
Powered by blists - more mailing lists