[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fd9d8a05-32e8-4f83-8e40-a6497dde1ed5@chenxiaosong.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 09:46:12 +0800
From: ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong@...nxiaosong.com>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>, chenxiaosong.chenxiaosong@...ux.dev
Cc: sfrench@...ba.org, smfrench@...il.com, linkinjeon@...ba.org,
christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/14] smb/server: remove create_durable_reconn_req
Okay, I'll make the changes.
Once you've applied some of the patches from this version, I'll
immediately send the next version.
Thanks,
ChenXiaoSong.
On 11/13/25 9:19 AM, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2025 at 4:32 PM <chenxiaosong.chenxiaosong@...ux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> From: ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong@...inos.cn>
>>
>> The fields in struct create_durable_reconn_req and struct create_durable
>> are exactly the same.
>>
>> The documentation references are:
>>
>> - SMB2_CREATE_DURABLE_HANDLE_REQUEST in MS-SMB2 2.2.13.2.3
>> - SMB2_CREATE_DURABLE_HANDLE_RECONNECT in MS-SMB2 2.2.13.2.4
>> - SMB2_FILEID in MS-SMB2 2.2.14.1
>>
>> We can give these two structs a uniform name: create_durable.
> Please use typedef to define multiple aliases for a single struct.
> typedef struct {
> ...
> } create_durable, create_durable_reconn_req;
>
> Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists