[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c6020af6-83d0-46c9-aad9-2187b7f07cbe@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 08:26:14 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: inline csum_ipv6_magic()
On 11/13/25 07:45, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Inline this small helper.
>
> This reduces register pressure, as saddr and daddr are often
> back to back in memory.
>
> For instance code inlined in tcp6_gro_receive() will look like:
Could you please double check what the code growth is for this across
the tree? There are 80-ish users of csum_ipv6_magic().
Or, is there a discrete, measurable performance gain from doing this?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists