[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251113175745.2e29afe7@endymion>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 17:57:45 +0100
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/cma: Remove CONFIG_CMA_SYSFS option
On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 16:35:03 +0100, David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) wrote:
> On 13.11.25 14:56, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > The sysfs interface to CMA has a marginal runtime cost and a small
> > footprint, there's no reason not to include it in all kernels where
> > the dependencies are satisfied.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
> > ---
> > As discussed with David:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/8/6/371
>
> Thanks for the reminder, it sounded familiar but I couldn't remember
> when this was discussed.
>
> Hoping this was properly compile-tested :)
Yes of course, I build-tested with both CONFIG_SYSFS=y and CONFIG_SYSFS
disabled.
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@...nel.org>
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
Powered by blists - more mailing lists