[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <209646801ba4a40da89aa16853524756@disroot.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 18:09:22 +0000
From: Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@...root.org>
To: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@...il.com>
Cc: Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>, Jagan Teki
<jagan@...rulasolutions.com>, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, Neil Armstrong
<neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Laurent
Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, Jonas Karlman
<jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, Maarten
Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard
<mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie
<airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: samsung-dsim: Fix device node reference leak
in samsung_dsim_parse_dt
On 2025-10-29 07:41, Miaoqian Lin wrote:
> The function samsung_dsim_parse_dt() calls of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs()
> to get the endpoint device node, but fails to call of_node_put() to release
> the reference when the function returns. This results in a device node
> reference leak.
>
> Fix this by adding the missing of_node_put() call before returning from
> the function.
>
> Found via static analysis and code review.
>
> Fixes: 77169a11d4e9 ("drm/bridge: samsung-dsim: add driver support for exynos7870 DSIM bridge")
Is the Fixes: tag correct? This is what I get for relevant code:
74629c49e66cc (Marek Vasut 2023-05-14 08:46:25 -0300 2074) endpoint = of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(node, 1, -1);
74629c49e66cc (Marek Vasut 2023-05-14 08:46:25 -0300 2075) nr_lanes = of_property_count_u32_elems(endpoint, "data-lanes");
74629c49e66cc (Marek Vasut 2023-05-14 08:46:25 -0300 2076) if (nr_lanes > 0 && nr_lanes <= 4) {
74629c49e66cc (Marek Vasut 2023-05-14 08:46:25 -0300 2077) /* Polarity 0 is clock lane, 1..4 are data lanes. */
74629c49e66cc (Marek Vasut 2023-05-14 08:46:25 -0300 2078) of_property_read_u32_array(endpoint, "lane-polarities",
74629c49e66cc (Marek Vasut 2023-05-14 08:46:25 -0300 2079) lane_polarities, nr_lanes + 1);
74629c49e66cc (Marek Vasut 2023-05-14 08:46:25 -0300 2080) for (i = 1; i <= nr_lanes; i++) {
74629c49e66cc (Marek Vasut 2023-05-14 08:46:25 -0300 2081) if (lane_polarities[1] != lane_polarities[i])
74629c49e66cc (Marek Vasut 2023-05-14 08:46:25 -0300 2082) DRM_DEV_ERROR(dsi->dev, "Data lanes polarities do not match");
74629c49e66cc (Marek Vasut 2023-05-14 08:46:25 -0300 2083) }
74629c49e66cc (Marek Vasut 2023-05-14 08:46:25 -0300 2084) if (lane_polarities[0])
74629c49e66cc (Marek Vasut 2023-05-14 08:46:25 -0300 2085) dsi->swap_dn_dp_clk = true;
74629c49e66cc (Marek Vasut 2023-05-14 08:46:25 -0300 2086) if (lane_polarities[1])
74629c49e66cc (Marek Vasut 2023-05-14 08:46:25 -0300 2087) dsi->swap_dn_dp_data = true;
74629c49e66cc (Marek Vasut 2023-05-14 08:46:25 -0300 2088) }
This should be a fix for 74629c49e66c instead.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists