[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025111321-proving-pliable-9b50@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 15:32:32 -0500
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, rwarsow@....de,
conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org,
achill@...ill.org, sr@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/40] 6.12.57-rc1 review
On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 07:02:30PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On 10/31/25 07:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.57 release.
> > There are 40 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sun, 02 Nov 2025 14:00:34 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> ...
> > Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > perf: Use current->flags & PF_KTHREAD|PF_USER_WORKER instead of current->mm == NULL
> >
> This patch triggers a crash in one of our stress tests.
>
> The problem is also seen in 6.18-rc5, so it is not LTS specific.
Great, we are bug compatible! :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists