lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <EB4C7FF1-8350-43FC-B879-20EA0E733F09@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 16:45:56 -0500
From: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
To: Balbir Singh <balbirs@...dia.com>,
 "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@...il.com>,
 Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@...com>, Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>,
 Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>, Ying Huang <ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
 Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
 Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
 "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>,
 Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>,
 Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>, Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>,
 Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
 Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
 Mika Penttilä <mpenttil@...hat.com>,
 Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>,
 Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/huge_memory.c: introduce split_unmapped_folio_to_order

On 13 Nov 2025, at 16:39, Balbir Singh wrote:

> On 11/13/25 10:49, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> On 11/12/25 22:34, David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) wrote:
>>> On 12.11.25 11:17, Balbir Singh wrote:
>>>> On 11/12/25 21:00, David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) wrote:
>>>>> On 12.11.25 05:46, Balbir Singh wrote:
>>>>>> Unmapped was added as a parameter to __folio_split() and related
>>>>>> call sites to support splitting of folios already in the midst
>>>>>> of a migration. This special case arose for device private folio
>>>>>> migration since during migration there could be a disconnect between
>>>>>> source and destination on the folio size.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Introduce split_unmapped_folio_to_order() to handle this special case.
>>>>>> This in turn removes the special casing introduced by the unmapped
>>>>>> parameter in __folio_split().
>>>>>
>>>>> As raised recently, I would hope that we can find a way to make all these splitting functions look more similar in the long term, ideally starting with "folio_split" / "folio_try_split".
>>>>>
>>>>> What about
>>>>>
>>>>>      folio_split_unmapped()
>>>>>
>>>>> Do we really have to spell out the "to order" part in the function name?
>>>>>
>>>>> And if it's more a mostly-internal helper, maybe
>>>>>
>>>>>      __folio_split_unmapped()
>>>>>
>>>>> subject: "mm/huge_memory: introduce ..."
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I can rename it, but currently it confirms to the split_folio with order in the name
>>>> The order is there in the name because in the future with mTHP we will want to
>>>> support splitting to various orders.
>>>
>>> I think we should start naming them more consistently regarding folio_split() immediately and cleanup the other ones later.
>>>
>>> I don't understand why "_to_order" must be in the name right now. You can add another variant and start using longer names when really required.
>>>
>>
>> Ack
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>>>>>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@...il.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@...com>
>>>>>> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
>>>>>> Cc: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
>>>>>> Cc: Ying Huang <ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
>>>>>> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
>>>>>> Cc: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
>>>>>> Cc: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
>>>>>> Cc: Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>
>>>>>> Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
>>>>>> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>
>>>>>> Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Mika Penttilä <mpenttil@...hat.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@...el.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Suggested-by: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbirs@...dia.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>    include/linux/huge_mm.h |   5 +-
>>>>>>    mm/huge_memory.c        | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>>>>>    mm/migrate_device.c     |   3 +-
>>>>>>    3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>>>>> index e2e91aa1a042..9155e683c08a 100644
>>>>>> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>>>>> @@ -371,7 +371,8 @@ enum split_type {
>>>>>>      bool can_split_folio(struct folio *folio, int caller_pins, int *pextra_pins);
>>>>>>    int __split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
>>>>>> -        unsigned int new_order, bool unmapped);
>>>>>> +        unsigned int new_order);
>>>>>> +int split_unmapped_folio_to_order(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order);
>>>>>>    int min_order_for_split(struct folio *folio);
>>>>>>    int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list);
>>>>>>    bool folio_split_supported(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
>>>>>> @@ -382,7 +383,7 @@ int folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order, struct page *page,
>>>>>>    static inline int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
>>>>>>            unsigned int new_order)
>>>>>>    {
>>>>>> -    return __split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(page, list, new_order, false);
>>>>>> +    return __split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(page, list, new_order);
>>>>>>    }
>>>>>>    static inline int split_huge_page_to_order(struct page *page, unsigned int new_order)
>>>>>>    {
>>>>>> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
>>>>>> index 0184cd915f44..942bd8410c54 100644
>>>>>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
>>>>>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
>>>>>> @@ -3747,7 +3747,6 @@ bool folio_split_supported(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
>>>>>>     * @lock_at: a page within @folio to be left locked to caller
>>>>>>     * @list: after-split folios will be put on it if non NULL
>>>>>>     * @split_type: perform uniform split or not (non-uniform split)
>>>>>> - * @unmapped: The pages are already unmapped, they are migration entries.
>>>>>>     *
>>>>>>     * It calls __split_unmapped_folio() to perform uniform and non-uniform split.
>>>>>>     * It is in charge of checking whether the split is supported or not and
>>>>>> @@ -3763,7 +3762,7 @@ bool folio_split_supported(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
>>>>>>     */
>>>>>>    static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
>>>>>>            struct page *split_at, struct page *lock_at,
>>>>>> -        struct list_head *list, enum split_type split_type, bool unmapped)
>>>>>> +        struct list_head *list, enum split_type split_type)
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, nice to see that go.
>>>>>
>>>>>>    {
>>>>>>        struct deferred_split *ds_queue;
>>>>>>        XA_STATE(xas, &folio->mapping->i_pages, folio->index);
>>>>>> @@ -3809,14 +3808,12 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
>>>>>>             * is taken to serialise against parallel split or collapse
>>>>>>             * operations.
>>>>>>             */
>>>>>> -        if (!unmapped) {
>>>>>> -            anon_vma = folio_get_anon_vma(folio);
>>>>>> -            if (!anon_vma) {
>>>>>> -                ret = -EBUSY;
>>>>>> -                goto out;
>>>>>> -            }
>>>>>> -            anon_vma_lock_write(anon_vma);
>>>>>> +        anon_vma = folio_get_anon_vma(folio);
>>>>>> +        if (!anon_vma) {
>>>>>> +            ret = -EBUSY;
>>>>>> +            goto out;
>>>>>>            }
>>>>>> +        anon_vma_lock_write(anon_vma);
>>>>>>            mapping = NULL;
>>>>>>        } else {
>>>>>>            unsigned int min_order;
>>>>>> @@ -3882,8 +3879,7 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
>>>>>>            goto out_unlock;
>>>>>>        }
>>>>>>    -    if (!unmapped)
>>>>>> -        unmap_folio(folio);
>>>>>> +    unmap_folio(folio);
>>>>>>   
>>>>>
>>>>> Hm, I would have hoped that we could factor out the core logic and reuse it for the new helper, instead of duplicating code.
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you look into that?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I did, I ended up with larger spaghetti, I was hoping to look it as a follow up
>>>> after the series with the mTHP changes and support (that is to be designed and
>>>> prototyped).
>>>
>>> Looking at it in more detail, the code duplication is not desired.
>>>
>>> We have to find a way to factor the existing code out and reuse it from any new function.
>>>
>>
>> I came up with a helper, but that ends up with another boolean do_lru.
>>
>>
>
> Zi, David, any opinions on the approach below?

Looks good to me. We might want a better name instead of
__folio_split_unmapped(). Or __split_unmapped_folio() should
be renamed, since these two function names are too similar.

Maybe __folio_split_unmapped() -> __freeze_and_split_unmapped_folio().

Feel free to come up with a better name. :)

>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/huge_mm.h |   5 +-
>>  mm/huge_memory.c        | 336 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>  mm/migrate_device.c     |   3 +-
>>  3 files changed, 195 insertions(+), 149 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>> index e2e91aa1a042..44c09755bada 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>> @@ -371,7 +371,8 @@ enum split_type {
>>
>>  bool can_split_folio(struct folio *folio, int caller_pins, int *pextra_pins);
>>  int __split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
>> -		unsigned int new_order, bool unmapped);
>> +		unsigned int new_order);
>> +int split_unmapped_folio(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order);
>>  int min_order_for_split(struct folio *folio);
>>  int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list);
>>  bool folio_split_supported(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
>> @@ -382,7 +383,7 @@ int folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order, struct page *page,
>>  static inline int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
>>  		unsigned int new_order)
>>  {
>> -	return __split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(page, list, new_order, false);
>> +	return __split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(page, list, new_order);
>>  }
>>  static inline int split_huge_page_to_order(struct page *page, unsigned int new_order)
>>  {
>> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
>> index 0184cd915f44..534befe1b7aa 100644
>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
>> @@ -3739,6 +3739,152 @@ bool folio_split_supported(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
>>  	return true;
>>  }
>>
>> +static int __folio_split_unmapped(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
>> +				  struct page *split_at, struct xa_state *xas,
>> +				  struct address_space *mapping, bool do_lru,
>> +				  struct list_head *list, enum split_type split_type,
>> +				  int extra_pins)
>> +{
>> +	struct folio *end_folio = folio_next(folio);
>> +	struct folio *new_folio, *next;
>> +	int old_order = folio_order(folio);
>> +	int nr_shmem_dropped = 0;
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +	pgoff_t end = 0;
>> +	struct deferred_split *ds_queue;
>> +
>> +	/* Prevent deferred_split_scan() touching ->_refcount */
>> +	ds_queue = folio_split_queue_lock(folio);
>> +	if (folio_ref_freeze(folio, 1 + extra_pins)) {
>> +		struct swap_cluster_info *ci = NULL;
>> +		struct lruvec *lruvec;
>> +		int expected_refs;
>> +
>> +		if (old_order > 1) {
>> +			if (!list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list)) {
>> +				ds_queue->split_queue_len--;
>> +				/*
>> +				 * Reinitialize page_deferred_list after removing the
>> +				 * page from the split_queue, otherwise a subsequent
>> +				 * split will see list corruption when checking the
>> +				 * page_deferred_list.
>> +				 */
>> +				list_del_init(&folio->_deferred_list);
>> +			}
>> +			if (folio_test_partially_mapped(folio)) {
>> +				folio_clear_partially_mapped(folio);
>> +				mod_mthp_stat(old_order,
>> +					MTHP_STAT_NR_ANON_PARTIALLY_MAPPED, -1);
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +		split_queue_unlock(ds_queue);
>> +		if (mapping) {
>> +			int nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
>> +
>> +			if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio) &&
>> +			    new_order < HPAGE_PMD_ORDER) {
>> +				if (folio_test_swapbacked(folio)) {
>> +					__lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio,
>> +							NR_SHMEM_THPS, -nr);
>> +				} else {
>> +					__lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio,
>> +							NR_FILE_THPS, -nr);
>> +					filemap_nr_thps_dec(mapping);
>> +				}
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (folio_test_swapcache(folio)) {
>> +			if (mapping) {
>> +				VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(mapping, folio);
>> +				return -EINVAL;
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			ci = swap_cluster_get_and_lock(folio);
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		/* lock lru list/PageCompound, ref frozen by page_ref_freeze */
>> +		if (do_lru)
>> +			lruvec = folio_lruvec_lock(folio);
>> +
>> +		ret = __split_unmapped_folio(folio, new_order, split_at, xas,
>> +					     mapping, split_type);
>> +
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Unfreeze after-split folios and put them back to the right
>> +		 * list. @folio should be kept frozon until page cache
>> +		 * entries are updated with all the other after-split folios
>> +		 * to prevent others seeing stale page cache entries.
>> +		 * As a result, new_folio starts from the next folio of
>> +		 * @folio.
>> +		 */
>> +		for (new_folio = folio_next(folio); new_folio != end_folio;
>> +		     new_folio = next) {
>> +			unsigned long nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(new_folio);
>> +
>> +			next = folio_next(new_folio);
>> +
>> +			zone_device_private_split_cb(folio, new_folio);
>> +
>> +			expected_refs = folio_expected_ref_count(new_folio) + 1;
>> +			folio_ref_unfreeze(new_folio, expected_refs);
>> +
>> +			if (do_lru)
>> +				lru_add_split_folio(folio, new_folio, lruvec, list);
>> +
>> +			/*
>> +			 * Anonymous folio with swap cache.
>> +			 * NOTE: shmem in swap cache is not supported yet.
>> +			 */
>> +			if (ci) {
>> +				__swap_cache_replace_folio(ci, folio, new_folio);
>> +				continue;
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			/* Anonymous folio without swap cache */
>> +			if (!mapping)
>> +				continue;
>> +
>> +			/* Add the new folio to the page cache. */
>> +			if (new_folio->index < end) {
>> +				__xa_store(&mapping->i_pages, new_folio->index,
>> +					   new_folio, 0);
>> +				continue;
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			/* Drop folio beyond EOF: ->index >= end */
>> +			if (shmem_mapping(mapping))
>> +				nr_shmem_dropped += nr_pages;
>> +			else if (folio_test_clear_dirty(new_folio))
>> +				folio_account_cleaned(
>> +					new_folio, inode_to_wb(mapping->host));
>> +			__filemap_remove_folio(new_folio, NULL);
>> +			folio_put_refs(new_folio, nr_pages);
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		zone_device_private_split_cb(folio, NULL);
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Unfreeze @folio only after all page cache entries, which
>> +		 * used to point to it, have been updated with new folios.
>> +		 * Otherwise, a parallel folio_try_get() can grab @folio
>> +		 * and its caller can see stale page cache entries.
>> +		 */
>> +		expected_refs = folio_expected_ref_count(folio) + 1;
>> +		folio_ref_unfreeze(folio, expected_refs);
>> +
>> +		if (do_lru)
>> +			unlock_page_lruvec(lruvec);
>> +
>> +		if (ci)
>> +			swap_cluster_unlock(ci);
>> +	} else {
>> +		split_queue_unlock(ds_queue);
>> +		return -EAGAIN;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  /**
>>   * __folio_split() - split a folio at @split_at to a @new_order folio
>>   * @folio: folio to split
>> @@ -3747,7 +3893,6 @@ bool folio_split_supported(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
>>   * @lock_at: a page within @folio to be left locked to caller
>>   * @list: after-split folios will be put on it if non NULL
>>   * @split_type: perform uniform split or not (non-uniform split)
>> - * @unmapped: The pages are already unmapped, they are migration entries.
>>   *
>>   * It calls __split_unmapped_folio() to perform uniform and non-uniform split.
>>   * It is in charge of checking whether the split is supported or not and
>> @@ -3763,9 +3908,8 @@ bool folio_split_supported(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
>>   */
>>  static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
>>  		struct page *split_at, struct page *lock_at,
>> -		struct list_head *list, enum split_type split_type, bool unmapped)
>> +		struct list_head *list, enum split_type split_type)
>>  {
>> -	struct deferred_split *ds_queue;
>>  	XA_STATE(xas, &folio->mapping->i_pages, folio->index);
>>  	struct folio *end_folio = folio_next(folio);
>>  	bool is_anon = folio_test_anon(folio);
>> @@ -3809,14 +3953,12 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
>>  		 * is taken to serialise against parallel split or collapse
>>  		 * operations.
>>  		 */
>> -		if (!unmapped) {
>> -			anon_vma = folio_get_anon_vma(folio);
>> -			if (!anon_vma) {
>> -				ret = -EBUSY;
>> -				goto out;
>> -			}
>> -			anon_vma_lock_write(anon_vma);
>> +		anon_vma = folio_get_anon_vma(folio);
>> +		if (!anon_vma) {
>> +			ret = -EBUSY;
>> +			goto out;
>>  		}
>> +		anon_vma_lock_write(anon_vma);
>>  		mapping = NULL;
>>  	} else {
>>  		unsigned int min_order;
>> @@ -3882,8 +4024,7 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
>>  		goto out_unlock;
>>  	}
>>
>> -	if (!unmapped)
>> -		unmap_folio(folio);
>> +	unmap_folio(folio);
>>
>>  	/* block interrupt reentry in xa_lock and spinlock */
>>  	local_irq_disable();
>> @@ -3900,142 +4041,14 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
>>  		}
>>  	}
>>
>> -	/* Prevent deferred_split_scan() touching ->_refcount */
>> -	ds_queue = folio_split_queue_lock(folio);
>> -	if (folio_ref_freeze(folio, 1 + extra_pins)) {
>> -		struct swap_cluster_info *ci = NULL;
>> -		struct lruvec *lruvec;
>> -		int expected_refs;
>> -
>> -		if (old_order > 1) {
>> -			if (!list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list)) {
>> -				ds_queue->split_queue_len--;
>> -				/*
>> -				 * Reinitialize page_deferred_list after removing the
>> -				 * page from the split_queue, otherwise a subsequent
>> -				 * split will see list corruption when checking the
>> -				 * page_deferred_list.
>> -				 */
>> -				list_del_init(&folio->_deferred_list);
>> -			}
>> -			if (folio_test_partially_mapped(folio)) {
>> -				folio_clear_partially_mapped(folio);
>> -				mod_mthp_stat(old_order,
>> -					MTHP_STAT_NR_ANON_PARTIALLY_MAPPED, -1);
>> -			}
>> -		}
>> -		split_queue_unlock(ds_queue);
>> -		if (mapping) {
>> -			int nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
>> -
>> -			if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio) &&
>> -			    new_order < HPAGE_PMD_ORDER) {
>> -				if (folio_test_swapbacked(folio)) {
>> -					__lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio,
>> -							NR_SHMEM_THPS, -nr);
>> -				} else {
>> -					__lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio,
>> -							NR_FILE_THPS, -nr);
>> -					filemap_nr_thps_dec(mapping);
>> -				}
>> -			}
>> -		}
>> -
>> -		if (folio_test_swapcache(folio)) {
>> -			if (mapping) {
>> -				VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(mapping, folio);
>> -				ret = -EINVAL;
>> -				goto fail;
>> -			}
>> -
>> -			ci = swap_cluster_get_and_lock(folio);
>> -		}
>> -
>> -		/* lock lru list/PageCompound, ref frozen by page_ref_freeze */
>> -		lruvec = folio_lruvec_lock(folio);
>> -
>> -		ret = __split_unmapped_folio(folio, new_order, split_at, &xas,
>> -					     mapping, split_type);
>> -
>> -		/*
>> -		 * Unfreeze after-split folios and put them back to the right
>> -		 * list. @folio should be kept frozon until page cache
>> -		 * entries are updated with all the other after-split folios
>> -		 * to prevent others seeing stale page cache entries.
>> -		 * As a result, new_folio starts from the next folio of
>> -		 * @folio.
>> -		 */
>> -		for (new_folio = folio_next(folio); new_folio != end_folio;
>> -		     new_folio = next) {
>> -			unsigned long nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(new_folio);
>> -
>> -			next = folio_next(new_folio);
>> -
>> -			zone_device_private_split_cb(folio, new_folio);
>> -
>> -			expected_refs = folio_expected_ref_count(new_folio) + 1;
>> -			folio_ref_unfreeze(new_folio, expected_refs);
>> -
>> -			if (!unmapped)
>> -				lru_add_split_folio(folio, new_folio, lruvec, list);
>> -
>> -			/*
>> -			 * Anonymous folio with swap cache.
>> -			 * NOTE: shmem in swap cache is not supported yet.
>> -			 */
>> -			if (ci) {
>> -				__swap_cache_replace_folio(ci, folio, new_folio);
>> -				continue;
>> -			}
>> -
>> -			/* Anonymous folio without swap cache */
>> -			if (!mapping)
>> -				continue;
>> -
>> -			/* Add the new folio to the page cache. */
>> -			if (new_folio->index < end) {
>> -				__xa_store(&mapping->i_pages, new_folio->index,
>> -					   new_folio, 0);
>> -				continue;
>> -			}
>> -
>> -			/* Drop folio beyond EOF: ->index >= end */
>> -			if (shmem_mapping(mapping))
>> -				nr_shmem_dropped += nr_pages;
>> -			else if (folio_test_clear_dirty(new_folio))
>> -				folio_account_cleaned(
>> -					new_folio, inode_to_wb(mapping->host));
>> -			__filemap_remove_folio(new_folio, NULL);
>> -			folio_put_refs(new_folio, nr_pages);
>> -		}
>> -
>> -		zone_device_private_split_cb(folio, NULL);
>> -		/*
>> -		 * Unfreeze @folio only after all page cache entries, which
>> -		 * used to point to it, have been updated with new folios.
>> -		 * Otherwise, a parallel folio_try_get() can grab @folio
>> -		 * and its caller can see stale page cache entries.
>> -		 */
>> -		expected_refs = folio_expected_ref_count(folio) + 1;
>> -		folio_ref_unfreeze(folio, expected_refs);
>> -
>> -		unlock_page_lruvec(lruvec);
>> -
>> -		if (ci)
>> -			swap_cluster_unlock(ci);
>> -	} else {
>> -		split_queue_unlock(ds_queue);
>> -		ret = -EAGAIN;
>> -	}
>> +	ret = __folio_split_unmapped(folio, new_order, split_at, &xas, mapping,
>> +				     true, list, split_type, extra_pins);
>>  fail:
>>  	if (mapping)
>>  		xas_unlock(&xas);
>>
>>  	local_irq_enable();
>>
>> -	if (unmapped)
>> -		return ret;
>> -
>>  	if (nr_shmem_dropped)
>>  		shmem_uncharge(mapping->host, nr_shmem_dropped);
>>
>> @@ -4079,6 +4092,39 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * This function is a helper for splitting folios that have already been unmapped.
>> + * The use case is that the device or the CPU can refuse to migrate THP pages in
>> + * the middle of migration, due to allocation issues on either side
>> + *
>> + * The high level code is copied from __folio_split, since the pages are anonymous
>> + * and are already isolated from the LRU, the code has been simplified to not
>> + * burden __folio_split with unmapped sprinkled into the code.
>> + *
>> + * None of the split folios are unlocked
>> + */
>> +int split_unmapped_folio(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order)
>> +{
>> +	int extra_pins, ret = 0;
>> +
>> +	VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_mapped(folio), folio);
>> +	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
>> +	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_large(folio), folio);
>> +
>> +	if (!can_split_folio(folio, 1, &extra_pins)) {
>> +		ret = -EAGAIN;
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +
>> +	local_irq_disable();
>> +	ret = __folio_split_unmapped(folio, new_order, &folio->page, NULL,
>> +				     NULL, false, NULL, SPLIT_TYPE_UNIFORM,
>> +				     extra_pins);
>> +	local_irq_enable();
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * This function splits a large folio into smaller folios of order @new_order.
>>   * @page can point to any page of the large folio to split. The split operation
>> @@ -4127,12 +4173,12 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
>>   * with the folio. Splitting to order 0 is compatible with all folios.
>>   */
>>  int __split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
>> -				     unsigned int new_order, bool unmapped)
>> +				     unsigned int new_order)
>>  {
>>  	struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
>>
>>  	return __folio_split(folio, new_order, &folio->page, page, list,
>> -			     SPLIT_TYPE_UNIFORM, unmapped);
>> +			     SPLIT_TYPE_UNIFORM);
>>  }
>>
>>  /**
>> @@ -4163,7 +4209,7 @@ int folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
>>  		struct page *split_at, struct list_head *list)
>>  {
>>  	return __folio_split(folio, new_order, split_at, &folio->page, list,
>> -			     SPLIT_TYPE_NON_UNIFORM, false);
>> +			     SPLIT_TYPE_NON_UNIFORM);
>>  }
>>
>>  int min_order_for_split(struct folio *folio)
>> diff --git a/mm/migrate_device.c b/mm/migrate_device.c
>> index c50abbd32f21..23b7bd56177c 100644
>> --- a/mm/migrate_device.c
>> +++ b/mm/migrate_device.c
>> @@ -918,8 +918,7 @@ static int migrate_vma_split_unmapped_folio(struct migrate_vma *migrate,
>>
>>  	folio_get(folio);
>>  	split_huge_pmd_address(migrate->vma, addr, true);
>> -	ret = __split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(folio_page(folio, 0), NULL,
>> -							0, true);
>> +	ret = split_unmapped_folio(folio, 0);
>>  	if (ret)
>>  		return ret;
>>  	migrate->src[idx] &= ~MIGRATE_PFN_COMPOUND;
>
>
> Thanks,
> Balbir


Best Regards,
Yan, Zi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ