[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <316b04af-2005-47f0-887d-6e9d4031df5b@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 19:23:51 -0800
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@...dia.com>
To: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@....com>, james.morse@....com
Cc: amitsinght@...vell.com, baisheng.gao@...soc.com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com,
carl@...amperecomputing.com, catalin.marinas@....com, dakr@...nel.org,
dave.martin@....com, david@...hat.com, dfustini@...libre.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, gshan@...hat.com, guohanjun@...wei.com,
jeremy.linton@....com, jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, kobak@...dia.com,
lcherian@...vell.com, lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lpieralisi@...nel.org, peternewman@...gle.com, quic_jiles@...cinc.com,
rafael@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, rohit.mathew@....com,
scott@...amperecomputing.com, sdonthineni@...dia.com, sudeep.holla@....com,
tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com, will@...nel.org, xhao@...ux.alibaba.com,
Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/33] arm_mpam: Add the class and component structures
for firmware described ris
Hi, Ben and James,
On 11/7/25 04:34, Ben Horgan wrote:
> From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
[SNIP]
> +static int mpam_ris_create_locked(struct mpam_msc *msc, u8 ris_idx,
> + enum mpam_class_types type, u8 class_id,
> + int component_id)
> +{
> + int err;
> + struct mpam_vmsc *vmsc;
> + struct mpam_msc_ris *ris;
> + struct mpam_class *class;
> + struct mpam_component *comp;
> + struct platform_device *pdev = msc->pdev;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&mpam_list_lock);
> +
> + if (ris_idx > MPAM_MSC_MAX_NUM_RIS)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (test_and_set_bit(ris_idx, &msc->ris_idxs))
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + ris = devm_kzalloc(&msc->pdev->dev, sizeof(*ris), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ris)
> + return -ENOMEM;
The ris_idx bit in msc->ris_idxs is not cleared on error paths in this
function. The bit cannot be set again.
Not sure if this is a real problem in any case. Clearing the bit on
error paths may be clean code.
[SNIP]
Thanks.
-Fenghua
Powered by blists - more mailing lists