lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251113052357.41868-1-r4o5m6e8o@163.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 13:23:57 +0800
From: "rom.wang" <r4o5m6e8o@....com>
To: lexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Yufeng Wang <wangyufeng@...inos.cn>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] libfs: Fix NULL pointer access in simple_recursive_removal

From: Yufeng Wang <wangyufeng@...inos.cn>

There is an issue in the kernel:
if inode is NULL pointer. the function "inode_lock_nested"
(or function "inode_lock" before)
a crash will happen at code "&inode->i_rwsem".
[292618.520532] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000a0
[...]
[292618.560398] RIP: 0010:down_write+0x12/0x30
[292618.565580] Code: 83 f8 01 74 08 48 c7 47 20 01 00 00 00 f3 c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 ba 01 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff 48 89 f8 <f0> 48 0f c1 10 85 d2 74 05 e8 00 43 ff ff 65 48 8b 04 25 80 5c 01
[292618.587219] RSP: 0018:ffffb898dc86fc20 EFLAGS: 00010246
[292618.593666] RAX: 00000000000000a0 RBX: ffff94c84f363950 RCX: ffffff8000000000
[292618.602255] RDX: ffffffff00000001 RSI: 0000000000000063 RDI: 00000000000000a0
[292618.610844] RBP: ffffb898dc86fc78 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[292618.619434] R10: ffffb898dc86fca8 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
[292618.628022] R13: ffff94c84f362a20 R14: ffff954d3f2fb4a0 R15: ffff954c3afa5010
[292618.636612] FS:  0000555555989cc0(0000) GS:ffff956dbf900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[292618.646271] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[292618.653300] CR2: 00000000000000a0 CR3: 000000fc7f25a000 CR4: 00000000003406e0
[292618.661888] Call Trace:
[292618.665225]  simple_recursive_removal+0x4f/0x230
[292618.670994]  ? debug_fill_super+0xe0/0xe0
[292618.676079]  debugfs_remove+0x40/0x60
[292618.680799]  kvm_vcpu_release+0x19/0x30 [kvm]

Fixes: a3d1e7eb5abe ("simple_recursive_removal(): kernel-side rm -rf for ramfs-style filesystems")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org

Signed-off-by: Yufeng Wang <wangyufeng@...inos.cn>
---
 fs/libfs.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/libfs.c b/fs/libfs.c
index 1661dcb7d983..9090cd1f97c4 100644
--- a/fs/libfs.c
+++ b/fs/libfs.c
@@ -611,6 +611,8 @@ static void __simple_recursive_removal(struct dentry *dentry,
 		struct dentry *victim = NULL, *child;
 		struct inode *inode = this->d_inode;
 
+		if (!inode)
+			return;
 		inode_lock_nested(inode, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
 		if (d_is_dir(this))
 			inode->i_flags |= S_DEAD;
-- 
2.34.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ