lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <kyprvtaorfdq3a6fsddaww4jg6ixv253rfonrdv2snyhq4pkuh@zdei5bgqzd3o>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 15:03:25 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Yuwen Chen <ywen.chen@...mail.com>, axboe@...nel.dk, 
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bgeffon@...gle.com, licayy@...look.com, 
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	liumartin@...gle.com, richardycc@...gle.com, senozhatsky@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] zram: Implement multi-page write-back

On (25/11/12 21:40), Minchan Kim wrote:
> 
> In my opinion, it's much simpler and strightforward align with current zram
> writeback utility functions.

My preference is [1], which is very close to how current post-processing
is implemented in zram, w/o complexity that dedicated kthread handling
introduces and so on.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/45b418277c6ae613783b9ecc714c96313ceb841d.1763013260.git.senozhatsky@chromium.org

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ