linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] zram: introduce bio batching support for faster writeback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <azppxi725gcsjgbmcy6c2zvjwgevzt2ci6ri2bwsdc7x3zrk2r@w5yiry3cy2kc>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 15:08:44 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Yuwen Chen <ywen.chen@...mail.com>, 
	Richard Chang <richardycc@...gle.com>, Brian Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com>, 
	Fengyu Lian <licayy@...look.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] zram: introduce bio batching support for faster
 writeback

On (25/11/13 14:59), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
[..]
>  		if (!blk_idx) {
>  			blk_idx = alloc_block_bdev(zram);
> -			if (!blk_idx) {
> +			if (blk_idx) {
>  				ret = -ENOSPC;
>  				break;

This really was not supposed to happen.  Will fix in the next iteration.