[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251113084022.1255121-9-hch@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 09:39:49 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>,
Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 08/11] mempool: legitimize the io_schedule_timeout in mempool_alloc_from_pool
The timeout here is and old workaround with a Fixme comment. But
thinking about it, it makes sense to keep it, so reword the comment.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
mm/mempool.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mempool.c b/mm/mempool.c
index 88b9a8476d31..ea2f4f9bcfa1 100644
--- a/mm/mempool.c
+++ b/mm/mempool.c
@@ -427,10 +427,10 @@ static unsigned int mempool_alloc_from_pool(struct mempool *pool, void **elems,
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pool->lock, flags);
/*
- * Wait for someone else to return an element to @pool.
- *
- * FIXME: this should be io_schedule(). The timeout is there as
- * a workaround for some DM problems in 2.6.18.
+ * Wait for someone else to return an element to @pool, but wake
+ * up occasionally as memory pressure might have reduced even
+ * and the normal allocation in alloc_fn could succeed even if
+ * no element was returned.
*/
io_schedule_timeout(5 * HZ);
finish_wait(&pool->wait, &wait);
--
2.47.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists