[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72k1VqR7P7tY2V_siBQZrNXf_ck5aBkapo6M_6X=1P+nDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 11:06:09 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>,
Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] rust: workqueue: restrict delayed work to global wqs
On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 11:01 AM Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> When a workqueue is shut down, delayed work that is pending but not
> scheduled does not get properly cleaned up, so it's not safe to use
> `enqueue_delayed` on a workqueue that might be destroyed. To fix this,
> restricted `enqueue_delayed` to static queues.
Should this have a Fixes and Cc: stable?
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists