[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251113-inline-lock-unlock-v1-1-1b6e8c323bcf@google.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 11:45:07 +0000
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] rust: sync: inline various lock related methods
While debugging a different issue [1], I inspected a rust_binder.ko file
and noticed the following relocation:
R_AARCH64_CALL26 _RNvXNtNtNtCsdfZWD8DztAw_6kernel4sync4lock8spinlockNtB2_15SpinLockBackendNtB4_7Backend6unlock
This relocation (and a similar one for lock) occurred many times
throughout the module. That is not really useful because all this
function does is call spin_unlock(), so what we actually want here is
that a call to spin_unlock() dirctly is generated in favor of this
wrapper method.
Thus, mark these methods inline.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/p/20251111-binder-fix-list-remove-v1-0-8ed14a0da63d@google.com
Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
---
rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs | 7 +++++++
rust/kernel/sync/lock/global.rs | 2 ++
rust/kernel/sync/lock/mutex.rs | 5 +++++
rust/kernel/sync/lock/spinlock.rs | 5 +++++
4 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs
index 27202beef90c88dda13c58bbea9e8d4ce8d314de..1544347c89d24e2b892686d84fb07a79c18e1307 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs
@@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ impl<B: Backend> Lock<(), B> {
/// the whole lifetime of `'a`.
///
/// [`State`]: Backend::State
+ #[inline]
pub unsafe fn from_raw<'a>(ptr: *mut B::State) -> &'a Self {
// SAFETY:
// - By the safety contract `ptr` must point to a valid initialised instance of `B::State`
@@ -164,6 +165,7 @@ pub unsafe fn from_raw<'a>(ptr: *mut B::State) -> &'a Self {
impl<T: ?Sized, B: Backend> Lock<T, B> {
/// Acquires the lock and gives the caller access to the data protected by it.
+ #[inline]
pub fn lock(&self) -> Guard<'_, T, B> {
// SAFETY: The constructor of the type calls `init`, so the existence of the object proves
// that `init` was called.
@@ -177,6 +179,7 @@ pub fn lock(&self) -> Guard<'_, T, B> {
/// Returns a guard that can be used to access the data protected by the lock if successful.
// `Option<T>` is not `#[must_use]` even if `T` is, thus the attribute is needed here.
#[must_use = "if unused, the lock will be immediately unlocked"]
+ #[inline]
pub fn try_lock(&self) -> Option<Guard<'_, T, B>> {
// SAFETY: The constructor of the type calls `init`, so the existence of the object proves
// that `init` was called.
@@ -245,6 +248,7 @@ pub(crate) fn do_unlocked<U>(&mut self, cb: impl FnOnce() -> U) -> U {
impl<T: ?Sized, B: Backend> core::ops::Deref for Guard<'_, T, B> {
type Target = T;
+ #[inline]
fn deref(&self) -> &Self::Target {
// SAFETY: The caller owns the lock, so it is safe to deref the protected data.
unsafe { &*self.lock.data.get() }
@@ -252,6 +256,7 @@ fn deref(&self) -> &Self::Target {
}
impl<T: ?Sized, B: Backend> core::ops::DerefMut for Guard<'_, T, B> {
+ #[inline]
fn deref_mut(&mut self) -> &mut Self::Target {
// SAFETY: The caller owns the lock, so it is safe to deref the protected data.
unsafe { &mut *self.lock.data.get() }
@@ -259,6 +264,7 @@ fn deref_mut(&mut self) -> &mut Self::Target {
}
impl<T: ?Sized, B: Backend> Drop for Guard<'_, T, B> {
+ #[inline]
fn drop(&mut self) {
// SAFETY: The caller owns the lock, so it is safe to unlock it.
unsafe { B::unlock(self.lock.state.get(), &self.state) };
@@ -271,6 +277,7 @@ impl<'a, T: ?Sized, B: Backend> Guard<'a, T, B> {
/// # Safety
///
/// The caller must ensure that it owns the lock.
+ #[inline]
pub unsafe fn new(lock: &'a Lock<T, B>, state: B::GuardState) -> Self {
// SAFETY: The caller can only hold the lock if `Backend::init` has already been called.
unsafe { B::assert_is_held(lock.state.get()) };
diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/lock/global.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/lock/global.rs
index d65f94b5caf2668586088417323496629492932f..f0d086be5a69610cba315c2f375a0a7814f686d6 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/sync/lock/global.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/sync/lock/global.rs
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ pub unsafe fn init(&'static self) {
}
/// Lock this global lock.
+ #[inline]
pub fn lock(&'static self) -> GlobalGuard<B> {
GlobalGuard {
inner: self.inner.lock(),
@@ -84,6 +85,7 @@ pub fn lock(&'static self) -> GlobalGuard<B> {
}
/// Try to lock this global lock.
+ #[inline]
pub fn try_lock(&'static self) -> Option<GlobalGuard<B>> {
Some(GlobalGuard {
inner: self.inner.try_lock()?,
diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/lock/mutex.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/lock/mutex.rs
index 581cee7ab842ad62ec144e67138676c000a3f5e4..cda0203efefb9fcb32c7eab28721e8678ccec575 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/sync/lock/mutex.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/sync/lock/mutex.rs
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ unsafe impl super::Backend for MutexBackend {
type State = bindings::mutex;
type GuardState = ();
+ #[inline]
unsafe fn init(
ptr: *mut Self::State,
name: *const crate::ffi::c_char,
@@ -112,18 +113,21 @@ unsafe fn init(
unsafe { bindings::__mutex_init(ptr, name, key) }
}
+ #[inline]
unsafe fn lock(ptr: *mut Self::State) -> Self::GuardState {
// SAFETY: The safety requirements of this function ensure that `ptr` points to valid
// memory, and that it has been initialised before.
unsafe { bindings::mutex_lock(ptr) };
}
+ #[inline]
unsafe fn unlock(ptr: *mut Self::State, _guard_state: &Self::GuardState) {
// SAFETY: The safety requirements of this function ensure that `ptr` is valid and that the
// caller is the owner of the mutex.
unsafe { bindings::mutex_unlock(ptr) };
}
+ #[inline]
unsafe fn try_lock(ptr: *mut Self::State) -> Option<Self::GuardState> {
// SAFETY: The `ptr` pointer is guaranteed to be valid and initialized before use.
let result = unsafe { bindings::mutex_trylock(ptr) };
@@ -135,6 +139,7 @@ unsafe fn try_lock(ptr: *mut Self::State) -> Option<Self::GuardState> {
}
}
+ #[inline]
unsafe fn assert_is_held(ptr: *mut Self::State) {
// SAFETY: The `ptr` pointer is guaranteed to be valid and initialized before use.
unsafe { bindings::mutex_assert_is_held(ptr) }
diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/lock/spinlock.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/lock/spinlock.rs
index d7be38ccbdc7dc4d70caaed0e7088f59f65fc6d1..ef76fa07ca3a2b5e32e956e828be5b295da0bc28 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/sync/lock/spinlock.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/sync/lock/spinlock.rs
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ unsafe impl super::Backend for SpinLockBackend {
type State = bindings::spinlock_t;
type GuardState = ();
+ #[inline]
unsafe fn init(
ptr: *mut Self::State,
name: *const crate::ffi::c_char,
@@ -111,18 +112,21 @@ unsafe fn init(
unsafe { bindings::__spin_lock_init(ptr, name, key) }
}
+ #[inline]
unsafe fn lock(ptr: *mut Self::State) -> Self::GuardState {
// SAFETY: The safety requirements of this function ensure that `ptr` points to valid
// memory, and that it has been initialised before.
unsafe { bindings::spin_lock(ptr) }
}
+ #[inline]
unsafe fn unlock(ptr: *mut Self::State, _guard_state: &Self::GuardState) {
// SAFETY: The safety requirements of this function ensure that `ptr` is valid and that the
// caller is the owner of the spinlock.
unsafe { bindings::spin_unlock(ptr) }
}
+ #[inline]
unsafe fn try_lock(ptr: *mut Self::State) -> Option<Self::GuardState> {
// SAFETY: The `ptr` pointer is guaranteed to be valid and initialized before use.
let result = unsafe { bindings::spin_trylock(ptr) };
@@ -134,6 +138,7 @@ unsafe fn try_lock(ptr: *mut Self::State) -> Option<Self::GuardState> {
}
}
+ #[inline]
unsafe fn assert_is_held(ptr: *mut Self::State) {
// SAFETY: The `ptr` pointer is guaranteed to be valid and initialized before use.
unsafe { bindings::spin_assert_is_held(ptr) }
---
base-commit: 211ddde0823f1442e4ad052a2f30f050145ccada
change-id: 20251113-inline-lock-unlock-b1726632a99d
Best regards,
--
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists