linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kunit: Make filter parameters configurable via Kconfig

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251114142451-5fff7714-b714-4903-a12c-a13a28e88b40@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 14:25:52 +0100
From: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
To: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>, 
	Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kunit: Make filter parameters configurable via Kconfig

On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 11:02:06AM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 at 18:32, Thomas Weißschuh
> <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > Enable the preset of filter parameters from kconfig options, similar to
> > how other KUnit configuration parameters are handled already.
> > This is useful to run a subset of tests even if the cmdline is not
> > readily modifyable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
> > ---
> 
> Thanks. Do you think it'd make sense to also add one of these for
> kunit.action (i.e., support for listing tests/test attributes)?

I'm not sure. For my usecase not really.

> Otherwise, other than maybe the possibility of adding some detail to
> the help texts (though that'd just duplicate what's in the
> documentation for those module parameters), this looks good. We can
> always add more in a follow-up if it's useful.
> 
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>

Thanks!

(...)