[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<176308441424.1078849.2137986445668378761.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 01:40:14 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Kriish Sharma <kriish.sharma2006@...il.com>
Cc: ivecera@...hat.com, Prathosh.Satish@...rochip.com,
vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev, arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dpll: zl3073x: fix kernel-doc name and missing
parameter
in fw.c
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 05:56:42 +0000 you wrote:
> Documentation build reported:
>
> Warning: drivers/dpll/zl3073x/fw.c:365 function parameter 'comp' not described in 'zl3073x_fw_component_flash'
> Warning: drivers/dpll/zl3073x/fw.c:365 expecting prototype for zl3073x_flash_bundle_flash(). Prototype was for zl3073x_fw_component_flash() instead
> Warning: drivers/dpll/zl3073x/fw.c:365 No description found for return value of 'zl3073x_fw_component_flash'
>
> The kernel-doc comment above `zl3073x_fw_component_flash()` used the wrong
> function name (`zl3073x_flash_bundle_flash`) and omitted the `@...p` parameter.
> This patch updates the comment to correctly document the
> `zl3073x_fw_component_flash()` function and its arguments.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v2] dpll: zl3073x: fix kernel-doc name and missing parameter in fw.c
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/992b7d5fd8a8
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists