[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87seegr4q1.fsf@BLaptop.bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 16:52:54 +0100
From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>
To: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc: Benoît Monin <benoit.monin@...tlin.com>, Théo Lebrun
<theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>, Vladimir Kondratiev
<vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Fix HOTPLUG_PARALLEL dependency
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 03:05:23PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>> Hello Thomas,
>>
>> > With MIPS, it is possible to have SMP enabled without HOTPLUG_CPU
>> > selected. However, in kernel/cpu.c, some code that uses
>> > HOTPLUG_PARALLEL also requires HOTPLUG_CPU to be selected. Therefore,
>> > we should fix the HOTPLUG_PARALLEL dependency to depend on
>> > HOTPLUG_CPU, not just SMP.
>> >
>> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510270120.21wA1aX1-lkp@intel.com/
>> > Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>
>>
>> Do you have any comments about this fix?
>
> all good from my side, does it need to go via mips-fixes ?
This fixes a build failure that occurs only in unusual kernel
configurations, so from my point of view, it is not critical.
Gregory
>
> Thomas.
>
> --
> Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
> good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
--
Grégory CLEMENT, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists