[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wm3sbpk2.ffs@tglx>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 16:29:33 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>,
Alexander Viro
<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Ingo Molnar
<mingo@...hat.com>, Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>, Davidlohr Bueso
<dave@...olabs.net>, André Almeida
<andrealmeid@...lia.com>, Anna-Maria
Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>, Frederic Weisbecker
<frederic@...nel.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] restart_block: simplify expiration timestamps
On Tue, Nov 11 2025 at 10:48, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 10:38:50AM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>> Various expiration timestamps are stored in the restart block as
>> different types than their respective subsystem is using.
>>
>> Align the types.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
>> ---
>
> @Thomas, @Peter, do the timer/futex changes look fine to you?
I take them through tip as they are not conflicting with the poll part.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists