linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] unwind deferred: Annotate struct unwind_cache with __counted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <0EC77204-065B-442E-AD0A-B86B5CB3ABB2@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 17:15:01 +0100
From: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>,
 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
 Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
 "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] unwind deferred: Annotate struct unwind_cache with
 __counted_by

On 14. Nov 2025, at 16:49, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Which comment would you feel is more obvious that entries is not bound by
> nr_entries and prevent this patch from being sent again?

Both seem fine to me.