[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mafs0cy5k7ct3.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 18:18:32 +0100
From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bhe@...hat.com, rppt@...nel.org,
jasonmiu@...gle.com, arnd@...db.de, coxu@...hat.com,
dave@...ilevsky.ca, ebiggers@...gle.com, graf@...zon.com,
kees@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 08/13] kho: Remove abort functionality and support
state refresh
On Fri, Nov 14 2025, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> Previously, KHO required a dedicated kho_abort() function to clean up
> state before kho_finalize() could be called again. This was necessary
> to handle complex unwind paths when using notifiers.
>
> With the shift to direct memory preservation, the explicit abort step
> is no longer strictly necessary.
>
> Remove kho_abort() and refactor kho_finalize() to handle re-entry.
> If kho_finalize() is called while KHO is already finalized, it will
> now automatically clean up the previous memory map and state before
> generating a new one. This allows the KHO state to be updated/refreshed
> simply by triggering finalize again.
>
> Update debugfs to return -EINVAL if userspace attempts to write 0 to
> the finalize attribute, as explicit abort is no longer supported.
Documentation/core-api/kho/concepts.rst touches on the concept of
finalization. I suppose that should be updated as well.
Other than this,
Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
[...]
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists