[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251114-winbond-v6-18-rc1-spi-nor-swp-v1-10-487bc7129931@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 18:53:11 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>, Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Steam Lin <STLin2@...bond.com>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/19] mtd: spi-nor: swp: Rename a mask
"mask" is not very descriptive when we already manipulate two masks, and
soon will manipulate three. Rename it "bp_mask" to align with the
existing "tb_mask" and soon "cmp_mask".
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
---
drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c
index bac07287ada036f49c25237549e4900f76a0247d..971aac0581db2830a4bbee5603661ec1e6612e6f 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c
@@ -57,9 +57,9 @@ static void spi_nor_get_locked_range_sr(struct spi_nor *nor, const u8 *sr, loff_
u64 *len)
{
u64 min_prot_len;
- u8 mask = spi_nor_get_sr_bp_mask(nor);
+ u8 bp_mask = spi_nor_get_sr_bp_mask(nor);
u8 tb_mask = spi_nor_get_sr_tb_mask(nor);
- u8 bp, val = sr[0] & mask;
+ u8 bp, val = sr[0] & bp_mask;
if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_SR_BP3_BIT6 && val & SR_BP3_BIT6)
val = (val & ~SR_BP3_BIT6) | SR_BP3;
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static int spi_nor_sr_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, u64 len)
u64 min_prot_len;
int ret;
u8 status_old[1] = {}, status_new[1] = {};
- u8 mask = spi_nor_get_sr_bp_mask(nor);
+ u8 bp_mask = spi_nor_get_sr_bp_mask(nor);
u8 tb_mask = spi_nor_get_sr_tb_mask(nor);
u8 pow, val;
loff_t lock_len;
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static int spi_nor_sr_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, u64 len)
lock_len = ofs + len;
if (lock_len == nor->params->size) {
- val = mask;
+ val = bp_mask;
} else {
min_prot_len = spi_nor_get_min_prot_length_sr(nor);
pow = ilog2(lock_len) - ilog2(min_prot_len) + 1;
@@ -208,15 +208,15 @@ static int spi_nor_sr_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, u64 len)
if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_SR_BP3_BIT6 && val & SR_BP3)
val = (val & ~SR_BP3) | SR_BP3_BIT6;
- if (val & ~mask)
+ if (val & ~bp_mask)
return -EINVAL;
/* Don't "lock" with no region! */
- if (!(val & mask))
+ if (!(val & bp_mask))
return -EINVAL;
}
- status_new[0] = (status_old[0] & ~mask & ~tb_mask) | val;
+ status_new[0] = (status_old[0] & ~bp_mask & ~tb_mask) | val;
/*
* Disallow further writes if WP# pin is neither left floating nor
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static int spi_nor_sr_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, u64 len)
return 0;
/* Only modify protection if it will not unlock other areas */
- if ((status_new[0] & mask) < (status_old[0] & mask))
+ if ((status_new[0] & bp_mask) < (status_old[0] & bp_mask))
return -EINVAL;
return spi_nor_write_sr_and_check(nor, status_new[0]);
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static int spi_nor_sr_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, u64 len)
u64 min_prot_len;
int ret;
u8 status_old[1], status_new[1];
- u8 mask = spi_nor_get_sr_bp_mask(nor);
+ u8 bp_mask = spi_nor_get_sr_bp_mask(nor);
u8 tb_mask = spi_nor_get_sr_tb_mask(nor);
u8 pow, val;
loff_t lock_len;
@@ -301,11 +301,11 @@ static int spi_nor_sr_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, u64 len)
val = (val & ~SR_BP3) | SR_BP3_BIT6;
/* Some power-of-two sizes may not be supported */
- if (val & ~mask)
+ if (val & ~bp_mask)
return -EINVAL;
}
- status_new[0] = (status_old[0] & ~mask & ~tb_mask) | val;
+ status_new[0] = (status_old[0] & ~bp_mask & ~tb_mask) | val;
/* Don't protect status register if we're fully unlocked */
if (lock_len == 0)
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static int spi_nor_sr_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, u64 len)
return 0;
/* Only modify protection if it will not lock other areas */
- if ((status_new[0] & mask) > (status_old[0] & mask))
+ if ((status_new[0] & bp_mask) > (status_old[0] & bp_mask))
return -EINVAL;
return spi_nor_write_sr_and_check(nor, status_new[0]);
--
2.51.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists