[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a50ofqbq.fsf@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 18:59:21 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>, Michael Walle
<mwalle@...nel.org>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh
Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, Steam Lin <STLin2@...bond.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Hello,
Hello,
>>>> Here is a series adding support for 6 Winbond SPI NOR chips. Describing
>>>> these chips is needed otherwise the block protection feature is not
>>>> available. Everything else looks fine otherwise.
>>>
>>> I'm glad to see this, you're an locking expert now :). Do you care to
>>> extend the SPI NOR testing requirements [1] with steps on how to test the
>>> locking? There's some testing proposed at [2], would you please check and
>>> review it?
>>
>> Good idea. Let me have a loot at what Sean proposed.
>
> I proposed to him as well to update the testing requirements if he cares,
> he said he'll take a look. Sync with him please.
>
> Cheers,
> ta
>
>>
>>> [1] https://docs.kernel.org/driver-api/mtd/spi-nor.html#minimum-testing-requirements
>>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/92e99a96-5582-48a5-a4f9-e9b33fcff171@linux.dev/
For people who would like to follow, the proposal is here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20251114-winbond-v6-18-rc1-spi-nor-swp-v1-0-487bc7129931@bootlin.com/T/#mbae8b874181eb0401b30142f423b73b6389a0c54
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists