[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mafs0a50o5rwf.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 20:35:28 +0100
From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bhe@...hat.com, rppt@...nel.org,
jasonmiu@...gle.com, arnd@...db.de, coxu@...hat.com,
dave@...ilevsky.ca, ebiggers@...gle.com, graf@...zon.com,
kees@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/13] kho: Allow memory preservation state updates
after finalization
On Fri, Nov 14 2025, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> Currently, kho_preserve_* and kho_unpreserve_* return -EBUSY if
> KHO is finalized. This enforces a rigid "freeze" on the KHO memory
> state.
>
> With the introduction of re-entrant finalization, this restriction is
> no longer necessary. Users should be allowed to modify the preservation
> set (e.g., adding new pages or freeing old ones) even after an initial
> finalization.
>
> The intended workflow for updates is now:
> 1. Modify state (preserve/unpreserve).
> 2. Call kho_finalize() again to refresh the serialized metadata.
>
> Remove the kho_out.finalized checks to enable this dynamic behavior.
>
> This also allows to convert kho_unpreserve_* functions to void, as they
> do not return any error anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
[...]
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists