[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zf8o9y5x.ffs@tglx>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 21:06:34 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)"
<peterz@...radead.org>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Josh
Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Arnd
Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Jason
Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ard
Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Neeraj Upadhyay
<neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>, Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>, Josh
Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Andrew
Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Masahiro Yamada
<masahiroy@...nel.org>, Han Shen <shenhan@...gle.com>, Rik van Riel
<riel@...riel.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Dan Carpenter
<dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli
<juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>, Yair
Podemsky <ypodemsk@...hat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/31] context_tracking,x86: Defer some IPIs until a
user->kernel transition
On Fri, Nov 14 2025 at 10:45, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> But I did that test on a machine that would absolutely benefit from
> the IPI suppression that the OP is talking about here, and I think it
> would be really quite nice if a default distro kernel with a more or
> less default distribution could be easily convinced to run a user
> thread without interrupting it. It's a little bit had that NO_HZ_FULL
> is still an exotic non-default thing, IMO.
Feel free to help with getting it over the finish line. Feeling sad/bad
(or whatever you wanted to say with 'had') does not change anything as
you should know :)
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists