[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251114134434.5375d085a6bdc1671351f243@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 13:44:34 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
Cc: bhe@...hat.com, rppt@...nel.org, jasonmiu@...gle.com, arnd@...db.de,
coxu@...hat.com, dave@...ilevsky.ca, ebiggers@...gle.com, graf@...zon.com,
kees@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] kho: simplify state machine and enable dynamic
updates
On Fri, 14 Nov 2025 13:59:49 -0500 Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com> wrote:
> Andrew: This series applies against mm-nonmm-unstable, but should
> go right before LUOv5, i.e. on top of:
> "liveupdate: kho: use %pe format specifier for error pointer printing"
>
> Changelog v2:
> - Addressed comments from Mike and Pratyush
> - Added Review-bys.
>
> It also replaces the following patches, that once applied should be
> dropped from mm-nonmm-unstable:
> "liveupdate: kho: when live update add KHO image during kexec load"
> "liveupdate: Kconfig: make debugfs optional"
> "kho: enable KHO by default"
>
> This patch series refactors the Kexec Handover subsystem to transition
> from a rigid, state-locked model to a dynamic, re-entrant architecture.
> It also introduces usability improvements.
OK.
Where are we with the series "Live Update Orchestrator, v5"?
I'm seeing a couple of review comments which I plan to circle back on:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/aROZi043lxtegqWE@kernel.org
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/mafs0ms4tajcs.fsf@kernel.org
and a comment from yourself against
liveupdate-luo_core-integrate-with-kho.patch which indicates that you
plan to update that patch?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists