linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/9] KVM: SVM: Treat exit_code as an unsigned 64-bit value through all of KVM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fed3c66f-c092-4153-a1cf-0a834bcf2397@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2025 00:33:05 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
 Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, "K. Y. Srinivasan"
 <kys@...rosoft.com>, Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
 Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
 kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
 Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] KVM: SVM: Treat exit_code as an unsigned 64-bit value
 through all of KVM

On 11/14/25 16:47, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2025, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> _and_ the hyperv_svm_test selftest fails.  *sigh*
> 
> And the weekend can't come soon enough.  The kernel I'm testing doesn't even have
> these patches.  /facepalm

Yep, my fault; I did the same mistake (in reverse) when preparing the 
last pull request.  Yosry wrote about this a few days ago.

Paolo