[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d5b3dcf-c233-4040-96a9-8ee7b000aa2e@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 16:26:18 -0800
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, Boqun Feng
<boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>, Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] rust: workqueue: add creation of workqueues
On 11/13/25 2:01 AM, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> Creating workqueues is needed by various GPU drivers. Not only does it
> give you better control over execution, it also allows devices to ensure
> that all tasks have exited before the device is unbound (or similar) by
> running the workqueue destructor.
Hi Alice,
Thanks for doing this! I am not seeing any large issues, other
than the Device<Bound> point that Danilo requested.
>
> A wrapper type Flags is provided for workqueue flags. It allows you to
> build any valid flag combination, while using a type-level marker for
> whether WQ_BH is used to prevent invalid flag combinations. The Flags wrapper
> also forces you to explicitly pick one of percpu, unbound, or bh.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
> ---
> rust/helpers/workqueue.c | 6 ++
> rust/kernel/workqueue.rs | 185 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 188 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rust/helpers/workqueue.c b/rust/helpers/workqueue.c
> index b2b82753509bf5dbd0f4ddebb96a95a51e5976b1..a67ed284b062b29937f09303cb516e6322cc961a 100644
> --- a/rust/helpers/workqueue.c
> +++ b/rust/helpers/workqueue.c
> @@ -12,3 +12,9 @@ void rust_helper_init_work_with_key(struct work_struct *work, work_func_t func,
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&work->entry);
> work->func = func;
> }
> +
> +struct workqueue_struct *rust_helper_alloc_workqueue(const char *fmt, unsigned int flags,
> + int max_active, const void *data)
> +{
> + return alloc_workqueue(fmt, flags, max_active, data);
> +}
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/workqueue.rs b/rust/kernel/workqueue.rs
> index 901102a8bca54c9fb58655d80fc9624b4dfe1dc1..313d897fe93ceb84844ce9b253edec837e60ba6d 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/workqueue.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/workqueue.rs
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@
> //! C header: [`include/linux/workqueue.h`](srctree/include/linux/workqueue.h)
>
> use crate::{
> - alloc::{AllocError, Flags},
> + alloc::{self, AllocError},
Nit: that should be:
alloc::{
self,
AllocError, //
},
> container_of,
> prelude::*,
> sync::Arc,
> @@ -194,7 +194,11 @@
> time::Jiffies,
> types::Opaque,
> };
> -use core::marker::PhantomData;
> +use core::{
> + marker::PhantomData,
> + ops::Deref,
> + ptr::NonNull, //
> +};
>
> /// Creates a [`Work`] initialiser with the given name and a newly-created lock class.
> #[macro_export]
> @@ -333,7 +337,7 @@ pub fn enqueue_delayed<W, const ID: u64>(&'static self, w: W, delay: Jiffies) ->
> /// This method can fail because it allocates memory to store the work item.
> pub fn try_spawn<T: 'static + Send + FnOnce()>(
> &self,
> - flags: Flags,
> + flags: alloc::Flags,
> func: T,
> ) -> Result<(), AllocError> {
> let init = pin_init!(ClosureWork {
> @@ -346,6 +350,181 @@ pub fn try_spawn<T: 'static + Send + FnOnce()>(
> }
> }
>
> +/// Workqueue flags.
> +///
> +/// A valid combination of workqueue flags contains one of the base flags (`WQ_UNBOUND`, `WQ_BH`,
Another tiny tweak: "contains exactly one", just to be extra clear.
> +/// or `WQ_PERCPU`) and a combination of modifier flags that are compatible with the selected base
> +/// flag.
> +///
> +/// For details, please refer to `Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst`.
> +#[repr(transparent)]
> +#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
> +pub struct Flags<const BH: bool>(bindings::wq_flags);
> +
> +// BH only methods
> +impl Flags<true> {
> + /// Execute in bottom half (softirq) context.
> + #[inline]
> + pub const fn bh() -> Flags<true> {
> + Flags(bindings::wq_flags_WQ_BH)
> + }
> +}
> +
> +// Non-BH only methods
> +impl Flags<false> {
> + /// Not bound to any cpu.
> + #[inline]
> + pub const fn unbound() -> Flags<false> {
> + Flags(bindings::wq_flags_WQ_UNBOUND)
> + }
> +
> + /// Bound to a specific cpu.
> + #[inline]
> + pub const fn percpu() -> Flags<false> {
> + Flags(bindings::wq_flags_WQ_PERCPU)
> + }
> +
It seems like the one public-facing item that's missing is
WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT. Should we add it? It provides some nice
flexibility for things like laptops.
Although I see that it has not made its way into
Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst (!).
Also, I think WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE might also be a desirable
addition.
> + /// Allow this workqueue to be frozen during suspend.
> + #[inline]
> + pub const fn freezable(self) -> Self {
> + Flags(self.0 | bindings::wq_flags_WQ_FREEZABLE)
> + }
> +
> + /// This workqueue may be used during memory reclaim.
> + #[inline]
> + pub const fn mem_reclaim(self) -> Self {
> + Flags(self.0 | bindings::wq_flags_WQ_MEM_RECLAIM)
> + }
> +
> + /// Mark this workqueue as cpu intensive.
> + #[inline]
> + pub const fn cpu_intensive(self) -> Self {
> + Flags(self.0 | bindings::wq_flags_WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE)
> + }
> +
> + /// Make this workqueue visible in sysfs.
> + #[inline]
> + pub const fn sysfs(self) -> Self {
> + Flags(self.0 | bindings::wq_flags_WQ_SYSFS)
> + }
> +}
> +
> +// Methods for BH and non-BH.
> +impl<const BH: bool> Flags<BH> {
> + /// High priority workqueue.
> + #[inline]
> + pub const fn highpri(self) -> Self {
> + Flags(self.0 | bindings::wq_flags_WQ_HIGHPRI)
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/// An owned kernel work queue.
> +///
> +/// Dropping a workqueue blocks on all pending work.
> +///
> +/// # Invariants
> +///
> +/// `queue` points at a valid workqueue that is owned by this `OwnedQueue`.
> +pub struct OwnedQueue {
> + queue: NonNull<Queue>,
> +}
> +
> +#[expect(clippy::manual_c_str_literals)]
Any reason not to move to c"" strings now? I suspect this is an
older patch that you've revived, and since then the new approach
showed up.
> +impl OwnedQueue {
> + /// Allocates a new workqueue.
> + ///
> + /// The provided name is used verbatim as the workqueue name.
"The provided name is used, verbatim, as the workqueue name."
Or simply:
"The provided name is used as the workqueue name."
> + ///
> + /// # Examples
> + ///
> + /// ```
> + /// use kernel::c_str;
> + /// use kernel::workqueue::{OwnedQueue, Flags};
> + ///
> + /// let wq = OwnedQueue::new(c_str!("my-wq"), Flags::unbound().sysfs(), 0)?;
> + /// wq.try_spawn(
> + /// GFP_KERNEL,
> + /// || pr_warn!("Printing from my-wq"),
> + /// )?;
> + /// # Ok::<(), Error>(())
> + /// ```
> + #[inline]
> + pub fn new<const BH: bool>(
> + name: &CStr,
> + flags: Flags<BH>,
> + max_active: usize,
> + ) -> Result<OwnedQueue, AllocError> {
> + // SAFETY:
> + // * "%s\0" is compatible with passing the name as a c-string.
> + // * the flags argument does not include internal flags.
> + let ptr = unsafe {
> + bindings::alloc_workqueue(
> + b"%s\0".as_ptr(),
> + flags.0,
> + i32::try_from(max_active).unwrap_or(i32::MAX),
Or just make max_active an i32.
> + name.as_char_ptr().cast::<c_void>(),
> + )
> + };
> +
> + Ok(OwnedQueue {
> + queue: NonNull::new(ptr).ok_or(AllocError)?.cast(),
> + })
> + }
> +
> + /// Allocates a new workqueue.
> + ///
> + /// # Examples
> + ///
> + /// This example shows how to pass a Rust string formatter to the workqueue name, creating
> + /// workqueues with names such as `my-wq-1` and `my-wq-2`.
> + ///
> + /// ```
> + /// use kernel::alloc::AllocError;
> + /// use kernel::workqueue::{OwnedQueue, Flags};
> + ///
> + /// fn my_wq(num: u32) -> Result<OwnedQueue, AllocError> {
> + /// OwnedQueue::new_fmt(format_args!("my-wq-{num}"), Flags::percpu(), 0)
> + /// }
> + /// ```
> + #[inline]
> + pub fn new_fmt<const BH: bool>(
> + name: core::fmt::Arguments<'_>,
> + flags: Flags<BH>,
> + max_active: usize,
> + ) -> Result<OwnedQueue, AllocError> {
> + // SAFETY:
> + // * "%pA\0" is compatible with passing an `Arguments` pointer.
> + // * the flags argument does not include internal flags.
> + let ptr = unsafe {
> + bindings::alloc_workqueue(
> + b"%pA\0".as_ptr(),
> + flags.0,
> + i32::try_from(max_active).unwrap_or(i32::MAX),
> + core::ptr::from_ref(&name).cast::<c_void>(),
> + )
> + };
> +
> + Ok(OwnedQueue {
> + queue: NonNull::new(ptr).ok_or(AllocError)?.cast(),
> + })
> + }
> +}
> +
> +impl Deref for OwnedQueue {
> + type Target = Queue;
> + fn deref(&self) -> &Queue {
> + // SAFETY: By the type invariants, this pointer references a valid queue.
> + unsafe { &*self.queue.as_ptr() }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +impl Drop for OwnedQueue {
> + fn drop(&mut self) {
> + // SAFETY: The `OwnedQueue` is being destroyed, so we can destroy the workqueue it owns.
> + unsafe { bindings::destroy_workqueue(self.queue.as_ptr().cast()) }
> + }
> +}
> +
> /// A helper type used in [`try_spawn`].
> ///
> /// [`try_spawn`]: Queue::try_spawn
>
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists