[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251114062817.852698-1-junjie.cao@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 14:28:17 +0800
From: Junjie Cao <junjie.cao@...el.com>
To: dmitry.torokhov@...il.com
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
junjie.cao@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH] Input: ti_am335x_tsc: fix off-by-one error in wire_order validation
The current validation 'wire_order[i] > ARRAY_SIZE(config_pins)' allows
wire_order[i] to equal ARRAY_SIZE(config_pins), which causes out-of-bounds
access when used as index in 'config_pins[wire_order[i]]'.
Since config_pins has 4 elements (indices 0-3), the valid range for
wire_order should be 0-3. Fix the off-by-one error by using >= instead
of > in the validation check.
Signed-off-by: Junjie Cao <junjie.cao@...el.com>
---
drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c
index 93d659ff90aa..73980142f492 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int titsc_config_wires(struct titsc *ts_dev)
wire_order[i] = ts_dev->config_inp[i] & 0x0F;
if (WARN_ON(analog_line[i] > 7))
return -EINVAL;
- if (WARN_ON(wire_order[i] > ARRAY_SIZE(config_pins)))
+ if (WARN_ON(wire_order[i] >= ARRAY_SIZE(config_pins)))
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists