linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] modpost: drop '*_probe' from section check whitelist

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aRbsLU-5KDN3HLDE@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:45:33 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] modpost: drop '*_probe' from section check whitelist

On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 09:16:28PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 05:48:21PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > Daniel has queued the clocksource fix for 6.19 now so I guess we can
> > just wait until both fixes hit mainline and either send this one to
> > Linus after that for -rc1 (or -rc2), or just wait until 6.20.
> > 
> > I'll send a reminder when both are in Linus's tree.
> 
> Thanks for the heads up! I think I would prefer having it bake in -next
> for a cycle so I will plan to apply it to kbuild-next once 6.19-rc1 is
> out. Then we should be able to catch any instances that crop up in new
> code from -next testing.

Sounds good, thanks.

Johan