[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e118987c-431c-4152-89d1-563f1312a574@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 20:13:58 +1100
From: Balbir Singh <balbirs@...dia.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@...il.com>, Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@...com>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>, Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>,
Ying Huang <ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>,
Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>, Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
Mika Penttilä <mpenttil@...hat.com>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>,
Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpu/drm/nouveau: fix return type in
nouveau_dmem_migrate_to_ram()
On 11/14/25 19:33, David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) wrote:
> On 14.11.25 02:22, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> ret of type vm_fault_t is reused to capture the return value of
>> nouveau_dmem_copy_folio(), which returns an int. Use a new variable
>> err to fix the issue. The issue is not new, prior to this the function
>> called was called nouveau_dmem_copy_one() and ret was used to capture
>> it's value.
>>
>> The bug does not cause a real issue at runtime, the value is used
>> as a boolean to check if nouveau_dmem_copy_folio() succeeded or failed.
>> The different types should not impact the execution of the code at
>> runtime.
>>
>
> Also, as commented previously, the prefix in the subject does not match existing norms. Take a look at
>
> git log --oneline drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
>
> and note how it's commonly something along the lines of "drm/nouveau" or better "drm/nouveau/dmem".
>
> The only patch that uses "gpu/drm/nouveau" is from you recently. In fact, there is no other patch in the codebase that uses that prefix.
>
I'll fix the subject prefix
Thanks for the review,
Balbir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists