[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1703d8d7-5105-4585-b8f0-82bb54809718@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 12:04:55 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,
ath11k@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
ath12k@...ts.infradead.org, Miaoqing Pan <miaoqing.pan@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: wireless: ath: Deprecate
'qcom,calibration-variant' property
On 14/11/2025 12:02, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 11:47:25AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 14/11/2025 11:22, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>>> On devicetree platforms, ath{10k/11k} drivers rely on the presence of the
>>> 'qcom,calibration-variant' property to select the correct calibration data
>>> for device variants with colliding IDs.
>>>
>>> But this property based selection has its own downside that it needs to be
>>> added to the devicetree node of the WLAN device, especially for PCI based
>>> devices. Currently, the users/vendors are forced to hardcode this property
>>> in the PCI device node. If a different device need to be attached to the
>>> slot, then the devicetree node also has to be changed. This approach is not
>>> scalable and creates a bad user experience.
>>>
>>> So deprecate this property from WLAN devicetree nodes and let the drivers
>>> do the devicetree model based calibration variant lookup using a static
>>> table.
>>>
>>> This also warrants removing the property from examples in the binding.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@....qualcomm.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> The problem - visible in one of the examples here - is that one board
>> has multiple WiFi chips and they use different calibration-variant
>> properties. How do you find the right calibration variant for such case
>> based on board machine match?
>>
>
> I suspect the legitimacy of the example here. I don't understand how a single
> machine can have same devices with 3 different calibration data.
Me neither but I am not the domain expert here.
>
> AFAIU, calibration data is specific to the platform design. And I don't see any
> upstream supported devicetree having similar properties.
Deprecating these is fine with me, but I would prefer if we get here
some clear answers that mentioned case cannot happen. If you are sure of
that, please mention it in commit msg.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists