[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251114124045.16204839@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 12:40:45 +0100
From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas@...der.be>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, Saravana
Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Hoan Tran
<hoan@...amperecomputing.com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, Pascal
Eberhard <pascal.eberhard@...com>, Miquel Raynal
<miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] gpio: renesas: Add support for GPIO and related
interrupts in RZ/N1 SoC
Hi Geert,
On Fri, 14 Nov 2025 10:43:40 +0100
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi Hervé,
>
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2025 at 08:41, Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 13:35:52 +0100
> > "Herve Codina (Schneider Electric)" <herve.codina@...tlin.com> wrote:
> > > This series adds support for GPIO and GPIO IRQ mux available in the
> > > RZ/N1 SoCs.
> >
> > The series seems ready to be applied even with the minor feedback from Wolfram
> > on patch 6.
> >
> > Do you expect a new iteration from my side or do you think this v6 iteration
> > can be applied as it?
>
> Sorry, I only realized yesterday that the GPIO Interrupt Multiplexer
> driver resides in drivers/soc/renesas/. Before, I mistakenly thought
> it was part of the GPIO subsystem.
>
> Anyway, it is a bit late in the cycle for me to take more patches for
> v6.19 (I am about to send my last PR right now), especially given the
> patches touching the DT and irqchip subsystems (with the DT ones being
> a hard dependency).
>
> So I suggest Rob takes the first two patches for v6.19, and we revisit
> the others for v6.20 (including late review comments), without having
> to worry about dependencies. Does that sound OK to you?
Sounds good to me, thanks.
Best regards,
Hervé
Powered by blists - more mailing lists