[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ebe07ad-cbfe-47e2-99ee-06ad7670e699@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 17:28:18 +0530
From: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@....qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Jessica Zhang <jesszhan0024@...il.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: display/msm: gpu: Document A612 GPU
On 11/10/2025 1:18 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 02:20:07AM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>> A612 GPU has a new IP called RGMU (Reduced Graphics Management Unit)
>> which replaces GMU. But it doesn't do clock or voltage scaling. So we
>> need the gpu core clock in the GPU node along with the power domain to
>> do clock and voltage scaling from the kernel. Update the bindings to
>> describe this GPU.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@....qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/gpu.yaml | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/gpu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/gpu.yaml
>> index 826aafdcc20b..a6bbc88e6a24 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/gpu.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/gpu.yaml
>> @@ -45,11 +45,11 @@ properties:
>> - const: amd,imageon
>>
>> clocks:
>> - minItems: 2
>> + minItems: 1
>> maxItems: 7
>>
>> clock-names:
>> - minItems: 2
>> + minItems: 1
>> maxItems: 7
>>
>> reg:
>> @@ -387,6 +387,34 @@ allOf:
>> required:
>> - clocks
>> - clock-names
>> +
>> + - if:
>> + properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + contains:
>> + const: qcom,adreno-612.0
>> + then:
>> + properties:
>> + clocks:
>> + items:
>> + - description: GPU Core clock
>> +
>> + clock-names:
>> + items:
>> + - const: core
>> +
>> + reg:
>> + items:
>> + - description: GPU Reg memory
>> +
>> + reg-names:
>> + items:
>> + - const: kgsl_3d0_reg_memory
>
> What happened with the second entry? Please describe the hardware
> COMPLETELY (see writing bindings doc).
We can describe cx_mem and cx_dbgc too here. Then it matches the common
schema described at the top of this file. In that case, do we need to
re-describe it here or we can just remove both reg and reg-names
properties here?
-Akhil.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists