lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DE9BX3JU2CXF.2TOJUW5WCLENA@nvidia.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2025 23:13:53 +0900
From: "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@...dia.com>
To: "John Hubbard" <jhubbard@...dia.com>, "Danilo Krummrich"
 <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@...dia.com>, "Joel Fernandes"
 <joelagnelf@...dia.com>, "Timur Tabi" <ttabi@...dia.com>, "Alistair Popple"
 <apopple@...dia.com>, "Edwin Peer" <epeer@...dia.com>, "Zhi Wang"
 <zhiw@...dia.com>, "David Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>, "Simona Vetter"
 <simona@...ll.ch>, "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, "Miguel Ojeda"
 <ojeda@...nel.org>, "Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, "Boqun Feng"
 <boqun.feng@...il.com>, "Gary Guo" <gary@...yguo.net>,
 Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "Benno Lossin"
 <lossin@...nel.org>, "Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, "Alice
 Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, "Trevor Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
 <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, "LKML"
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Nouveau"
 <nouveau-bounces@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/4] gpu: nova-core: add boot42 support for next-gen
 GPUs

On Sat Nov 15, 2025 at 10:09 AM JST, John Hubbard wrote:
> NVIDIA GPUs are moving away from using NV_PMC_BOOT_0 to contain
> architecture and revision details, and will instead use NV_PMC_BOOT_42
> in the future. NV_PMC_BOOT_0 will contain a specific set of values
> that will mean "go read NV_PMC_BOOT_42 instead".
>
> Change the selection logic in Nova so that it will claim Turing and
> later GPUs. This will work for the foreseeable future, without any
> further code changes here, because all NVIDIA GPUs are considered, from
> the oldest supported on Linux (NV04), through the future GPUs.
>
> Add some comment documentation to explain, chronologically, how boot0
> and boot42 change with the GPU eras, and how that affects the selection
> logic.
>
> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
> Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
> Cc: Timur Tabi <ttabi@...dia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/nova-core/gpu.rs  | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  drivers/gpu/nova-core/regs.rs | 21 +++++++++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/nova-core/gpu.rs b/drivers/gpu/nova-core/gpu.rs
> index 88a6d7af9f37..8e04628ca3d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/nova-core/gpu.rs
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/nova-core/gpu.rs
> @@ -169,6 +169,15 @@ fn from(boot0: regs::NV_PMC_BOOT_0) -> Self {
>      }
>  }
>  
> +impl From<regs::NV_PMC_BOOT_42> for Revision {
> +    fn from(boot0: regs::NV_PMC_BOOT_42) -> Self {
> +        Self {
> +            major: boot0.major_revision(),
> +            minor: boot0.minor_revision(),
> +        }
> +    }
> +}

Just one nit: similarly to how we are converting the `TryFrom<BOOT_0>
for Spec` into a `TryFrom<BOOT_42>`, I think we don't need to keep
`From<BOOT_0> for Revision`. Actually we don't even want it, as using it
would mean we are relying on BOOT_0 instead of BOOT_42, which this
patchset nicely makes our only source of truth.

I'll thus remove the `From<BOOT_0>` implementation before applying.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ